期刊文献+

Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China 被引量:15

Economic analysis of atmospheric mercury emission control for coal-fired power plants in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 Coal combustion and mercury pollution are closely linked, and this relationship is particularly relevant in China, the world's largest coal consumer. This paper begins with a summary of recent China-specific studies on mercury removal by air pollution control technologies and then provides an economic analysis of mercury abatement from these emission control technologies at coal-fired power plants in China. This includes a cost-effectiveness analysis at the enterprise and sector level in China using 2010 as a baseline and projecting out to 2020 and2030. Of the control technologies evaluated, the most cost-effective is a fabric filter installed upstream of the wet flue gas desulfurization system(FF + WFGD). Halogen injection(HI) is also a cost-effective mercury-specific control strategy, although it has not yet reached commercial maturity. The sector-level analysis shows that 193 tons of mercury was removed in 2010 in China's coal-fired power sector, with annualized mercury emission control costs of 2.7 billion Chinese Yuan. Under a projected 2030 Emission Control(EC) scenario with stringent mercury limits compared to Business As Usual(BAU) scenario, the increase of selective catalytic reduction systems(SCR) and the use of HI could contribute to 39 tons of mercury removal at a cost of 3.8 billion CNY. The economic analysis presented in this paper offers insights on air pollution control technologies and practices for enhancing atmospheric mercury control that can aid decision-making in policy design and private-sector investments. Coal combustion and mercury pollution are closely linked, and this relationship is particularly relevant in China, the world's largest coal consumer. This paper begins with a summary of recent China-specific studies on mercury removal by air pollution control technologies and then provides an economic analysis of mercury abatement from these emission control technologies at coal-fired power plants in China. This includes a cost-effectiveness analysis at the enterprise and sector level in China using 2010 as a baseline and projecting out to 2020 and2030. Of the control technologies evaluated, the most cost-effective is a fabric filter installed upstream of the wet flue gas desulfurization system(FF + WFGD). Halogen injection(HI) is also a cost-effective mercury-specific control strategy, although it has not yet reached commercial maturity. The sector-level analysis shows that 193 tons of mercury was removed in 2010 in China's coal-fired power sector, with annualized mercury emission control costs of 2.7 billion Chinese Yuan. Under a projected 2030 Emission Control(EC) scenario with stringent mercury limits compared to Business As Usual(BAU) scenario, the increase of selective catalytic reduction systems(SCR) and the use of HI could contribute to 39 tons of mercury removal at a cost of 3.8 billion CNY. The economic analysis presented in this paper offers insights on air pollution control technologies and practices for enhancing atmospheric mercury control that can aid decision-making in policy design and private-sector investments.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第7期125-134,共10页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 sponsored by the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2013CB430001) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21307070) the MEP's Special Funds for Research on Public Welfares (201209015) the Sino-Norwegian cooperation project (SINOMER Ⅲ)
关键词 Atmospheric mercury Coal-fired power plants China COST-EFFECTIVENESS Activated carbon and halogen injection Atmospheric mercury Coal-fired power plants China Cost-effectiveness Activated carbon and halogen injection
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Brown, T.D., Smith, D.N., O'Dowd, W.J., Hargis Jr., R.A., 2000. Control of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants a preliminary cost assessment and the next steps for accurately assessing control costs. Fuel Process. Technol. 63-66. 311-341.
  • 2Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME), 2012. Canada-wide Standard for Mercury Emissions from Coal-fired Electric Power Generation Plants.
  • 3China Council for Intemational Cooperation on Environment and Development (CCICED), 2011. Special Policy Study on Mercury Management in China, Beijing.
  • 4China Electricity Council (CEC), 2011. Annual Development Report of China's Power Industry 2011. China Market Press, Beijing.
  • 5Development, National, Reform Commission (NDRC), 2003. Administrative Regulations on Levy and use of Pollutant Discharge Fee. Beijing: NDRC, 2003., Beijing, China.
  • 6Feeley, T.J., Brickett, L.A., O'Palko, B.A., Jones, A.P., 2008. DOWNETL's mercury control technology R&D program--taking technology from concept to commercial reality. MEGA Symposium. Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 7Li, G.H., Feng, X.B., Li, Z.G., Qiu, G.L., Shang, L.H., Liang, P., et al., 2010. Mercury emission to atmosphere from primary Zn production in China. Sci. Total Environ. 408 (20), 4607-4612.
  • 8Minchener, A., 2012. Non-greenhouse Gas Emissions from Coal-fired Power Plants in China. CCC/196. IEA Clean Coal Centre, London 978-92-9029-516-7.
  • 9Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEP), 2011. Emission standard of air pollutants for thermal power plants (GB 1B22B-2011). MEP, Beijing.
  • 10Pacyna, J.M., Sundseth, K., Pacyna, E.G., Jozewicz, W., Munthe, J Belhaj, M., et al., 2010. An assessment of costs and benefits associated with mercury emission reductions from major anthropogenie sources. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 60 (3), 302-315.

同被引文献175

引证文献15

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部