期刊文献+

3-D打印胶原蛋白-硫酸肝素仿生脊髓支架的研究 被引量:10

PREPARATION OF BIONIC COLLAGEN-HEPARIN SULFATE SPINAL CORD SCAFFOLD WITH THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINT TECHNOLOGY
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的利用3-D生物打印机制备胶原蛋白-硫酸肝素仿生脊髓支架,为组织工程化治疗脊髓损伤提供细胞载体。方法制备硫酸肝素-胶原蛋白水凝胶,采用3-D打印仿生脊髓支架,扫描电镜观察其结构,排水法计算孔隙率,体外降解实验测量支架p H值和质量变化。取孕14 d SD大鼠的胎鼠脑皮质分离培养神经干细胞(neural stem cells,NSCs),实验分为2组,A组取仿生脊髓支架体外与NSCs共培养,B组直接将细胞悬液接种于预涂左旋多聚赖氨酸的24孔培养板上。采用光镜和扫描电镜观察细胞黏附与形态变化,MTT检测细胞活力,免疫荧光染色鉴定NSCs的分化情况。结果 3-D打印机成功制备出胶原蛋白-硫酸肝素仿生脊髓支架,扫描电镜显示内部具有纵行排列、平行的微孔结构,孔隙率为90.25%±2.15%;体外降解实验中,支架p H值未发生明显变化,8周左右支架降解完全,符合组织工程支架要求。MTT检测示两组培养1、3、7 d吸光度(A)值比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);光镜观察两组均可见大量神经球分化,神经纤维交织成网状;培养7 d A组扫描电镜观察示细胞黏附于支架上,大量细胞伸出轴突,并且有神经球形成;免疫荧光染色示,两组均可分化为神经元和胶质细胞,定量分析显示A、B组分化率分别为29.60%±2.68%和10.90%±2.13%,差异有统计学意义(t=17.30,P=0.01)。结论 3-D打印的胶原蛋白-硫酸肝素仿生脊髓支架具有良好的生物相容性,能促进NSCs增殖和分化,作为神经组织工程支架具有良好的研究和应用前景。 Objective To prepare bionic spinal cord scaffold of collagen-heparin sulfate by three-dimensional(3- D) printing, and provide a cell carrier for tissue engineering in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Methods Collagenheparin sulfate hydrogel was prepared firstly, and 3-D printer was used to make bionic spinal cord scaffold. The structure was observed to measure its porosity. The scaffold was immersed in simulated body fluid to observe the quality change. The neural stem cells(NSCs) were isolated from fetal rat brain cortex of 14 days pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats and cultured. The experiment was divided into 2 groups: in group A, the scaffold was co-cultured with rat NSCs for 7 days to observe cell adhesion and morphological changes; in group B, the NSCs were cultured in 24 wells culture plate precoating with poly lysine. MTT assay was used to detect the cell viability, and immunofluorescence staining was used to identify the differentiation of NSCs. Results Bionic spinal cord scaffold was fabricated by 3-D printer successfully. Scanning electron microscope(SEM) observation revealed the micro porous structure with parallel and longitudinal arrangements and with the porosity of 90.25%±2.15%. In vitro, the value of p H was not changed obviously. After 8 weeks, the scaffold was completely degraded, and it met the requirements of tissue engineering scaffolds. MTT results showed that there was no significant difference in absorbence(A) value between 2 groups at 1, 3, and 7 days after culture(P0.05). There were a lot of NSCs with reticular nerve fiber under light microscope in 2 groups; the cells adhered to the scaffold, and axons growth and neurosphere formation were observed in group A under SEM at 7 days after culture. The immunofluorescence staining observation showed that NSCs could differentiated into neurons and glial cells in 2 groups; the differentiation rate was 29.60%±2.68% in group A and was 10.90%±2.13% in group B, showing significant difference(t=17.30, P=0.01). Conclusion The collagen-heparin sulfate scaffold by 3-D-printed has good biocompatibility and biological properties. It can promote the proliferation and differentiation of NSCs, and can used as a neural tissue engineered scaffold with great value of research and application.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期1022-1027,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81301050 81271392 81471275 81401067) 天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划资助项目(14JCQNJC10200) 中国博士后基金项目(2013M542583)~~
关键词 仿生脊髓支架 3-D打印 神经干细胞 生物相容性 Bionic spinal scaffold Three-dimensional print Neural stem cells Biological compatibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Freund P, Curt A, Friston K, et al. Tracking changes following spinal cord in)ury: insights from neuroimaging. Neuroscientist, 2013, 19(2): 116-128.
  • 2Shrestha B, Coykendall K, Li Y, et al. Repair of in)ured spinal cord using biomaterial scaffolds and stem cells. Stern Cell Res Ther, 2014, 5(4): 91.
  • 3Ma W, Fitzgerald W, Liu QY, et al. CNS stem and progenitor cell differentiation into functional neuronal circuits in three- dimensional collagen gels. Exp Neurol, 2004, 190(2): 276-288.
  • 4Lavik E, Teng YD, Snyder E, et al. Seeding neural stem cells on scaffolds of PGA, PLA, and their copolymers. Methods Mol Biol, 2002, 198: 89-97.
  • 5M6llers S, Heschel I, Damink LH, et al. Cytocompatibility of a novel, longitudinally microstructured collagen scaffold intended for nerve tissue repair. Tissue Eng Part A, 2009, 15(3): 461-472.
  • 6Madigan NN, McMahon S, O'Brien T, et al. Current tissue engineering and novel therapeutic approaches to axonal regeneration following spinal cord injury using polymer scaffolds. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2009, 169(2): 183-199.
  • 7杨志明.加快发展3-D打印技术、扩展修复重建外科应用领域[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2014,28(3):265-265. 被引量:14
  • 8Michalski MH, Ross fS. The shape of things to come: 3D printing in medicine, lAMA, 2014, 312(21): 2213-2214.
  • 9Ishikawa T, Suzuki H, Ishikawa K, et al. Spinal cord ischemia/injury. Curt Pharm Des, 2014, 20(36): 5738-5743.
  • 10Krishna V, Konakondla S, Nicholas f, et al. Biomaterial-based interventions for neuronal regeneration and functional recovery in rodent model of spinal cord injury: a systematic review. ] Spinal CordMed, 2013, 36(3): 174-190.

共引文献13

同被引文献84

  • 1栾希英,段巧艳,段祥,王泳,李明忠,卢神州,张焕相,张学光.再生柞蚕丝素蛋白对人骨髓间充质干细胞体外扩增的支持作用[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2007,26(2):276-281. 被引量:8
  • 2朱浩,王文进,丁文龙.高效的雪旺细胞体外培养方法[J].解剖科学进展,2007,13(2):144-147. 被引量:13
  • 3Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Angoules AG, et al. Complications following autologous bone graft harvesting from the iliac crest and using the RIA: a systematic review. Injury, 2011, 42 Suppl 2: $3-S15.
  • 4Liu FH. Fabrication of bioceramic bone scaffolds for tissueengineering. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2014, 23 (10): 3762-3769.
  • 5Liu Y, Lim J, Teoh SH. Review: development of clinically relevant scaffolds for vascularised bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv, 2013, 31(5): 688-705.
  • 6Wei G, Li C, Fu Q, et al. Preparation of PCL/silk fibroin/collagen electrospun fiber for urethral reconstruction. Int Urol Nephrol, 2015, 47 (1): 95-99,.
  • 7Li ZY, Mi WY, Wang HL, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite/ polyacrylamide composite hydrogels with high mechanical strengths and cell adhesion properties. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 2014, 123: 959-964.
  • 8Meinel L, Fajardo R, Hofmann S, et al. Silk implants for the healing of critical size bone defects. Bone, 2005, 37(5): 688-698.
  • 9Vachiraroj N, Ratanavaraporn l, Damrongsakkul S, et al. A comparison of Thai silk fibroin-based and chitosan-based materials on in vitro biocompatibility for bone substitutes. Int l Biol Macromol, 2009, 45(5): 470-477.
  • 10Wu SL, Liu XM, Yeung KWK, et al. Biomimetic porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials Science and Engineering R, 2014, 80: 1-36.

引证文献10

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部