“应得”的古与今:范式转型与论域拓展被引量：2

On the History of the Concept of “Desert”: Concerning Its Paradigm Transformation and Discourse Domain Extension

下载PDF

导出

摘要 "应得"是当代分配正义的重要概念,也有着悠久的历史。古希腊时代亚里士多德等人语境中的"应得"对应的英文词汇是merit,这与现代社会强调的"应得"(deserve)有很多不同。前者指基于德性来应得公共职务,后者是基于理性个体的行动应得社会基本益品。"应得"从古代merit到近现代deserve的范式转型与启蒙运动息息相关。20世纪以来,约翰·罗尔斯等人对"应得"和"反应得"的区分再次深化了对这一问题的思考。当代"应得"的讨论还突破传统的问题域,在"代际应得"和"全球应得"等论域实现了新拓展。 As an important concept in contemporary distributive justice,'desert'has a long history.'Desert'in Aristotle and other thinkers in ancient Greece is similar to'merit'in modern English,referring to public positions based on virtue. On the contrary,'desert'in modern society means the deserving primary social goods according to the action of a rational individual. The paradigm transformation from ancient'merit'to modern 'deserve'is closely related to the Enlightenment. In the 20th century,further discussion has been carried out with the distinction between 'desert'and 'anti-desert'made by John Rawls and other thinkers. Contemporary discussion on 'desert'has also extended to intergenerational desert and global desert.

作者徐峰

机构地区南京大学哲学系

出处《华东师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期53-59,168,共7页 Journal of East China Normal University（Humanities and Social Sciences）

基金国家社会科学基金项目"马克思分配正义理论及其当代价值研究"(12BKS009) "南京大学优秀博士生创新能力提升计划B资助"的阶段性成果

关键词分配正义应得反应得代际正义全球正义 distributive justice,desert,anti-desert,intergenerational justice,global justice

分类号 D08 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献29

1[古希腊]柏拉图:《理想国》,郭斌和、张竹明译,北京:商务印书馆,1986年,第8页.
2[古希腊]亚里士多德:《尼各马可伦理学》,廖申白译,北京:商务印书馆,2003年,第134-136页.
3[古希腊]亚里士多德:《政治学》,吴寿彭译,北京:商务印书馆,1965年,第148-150页.
4Samuel FIeischacker, A Short History of Distributive Justice, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004, p.6.
5John Rawls, Justice as Fairness, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press, 2001, pp.58--59.
6[意大利]阿奎那:《阿奎那政治著作选》,马清槐译,北京:商务印书馆,1963年,第141—143页.
7Samuel Fleischacker, A Short History of Distributive Justice, MA : Harvard University Press, 2004, p.21 ; pp.68--70.
8Brian Tierney, Medival Poor Law, Berkeley : University of California Press, 1959, p.61.
9[英]洛克:《政府论》,叶启芳、瞿菊农译,北京:商务印书馆,1964年,第19页.
10John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, MA: Harvmxt University Press, 1999, p.89.

二级参考文献16

1约翰·罗尔斯著何怀宏等译.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第56、292页.
2约翰·罗尔斯.《政治自由主义》,万俊人译,南京:译林出版社,2000年,第37页.
3戴维·米勒.《社会正义原则》,应奇译,南京:江苏人民出版社,2001年,第6页.
4Andrew Dobson, Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Dimensions of Distributive Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 66.
5John O'Neill, Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well- being and the Natural World, london: Routledge, 1993, p. 34.
6Avner de - Shalit, Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations, London: Routledge, 1995, p. 15, p. 31, p. 16, p. 22, p. 28, p. 40.
7Avner de- Shalit, Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations, pp. 35-50, p. 13.
8Andrew Dobson, Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Dimensions of Distributive Justice, p. 105, p107.
9Joel Feinberg, "The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations", in E. Partridge, ed. Responsibilities to Future Generations, New York: Prometheus Books, 1981, p. 139.
10Brian Norton, " Environmental Ethics and the Rights of Future Generations", Environmental Ethics, vol. 4 (Winter 1982), p. 320. p.331.