期刊文献+

基于血管内超声评价冠状动脉临界病变的相关危险因素分析 被引量:2

Analysis of risk factors of coronary artery intermediate lesions on intravascular ultrasound
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过研究前降支近段或中段临界病变接受血管内超声(intravasc ularultrasound,IVUS)检查患者的临床特征,分析影响最小管腔面积(minimal lumenarea,MLA)的危险因素。方法选择符合入选标准的90例患者,收集其人口学资料、病史以及实验室检查数据,进行线性回归分析,筛选出影响MLA的危险因素。进一步以MLA〈4.0mm。或≥4.0mm。为界限进行区分,采用ROC曲线测定Logistic回归寻找到的危险因素在评价MLA中的价值。结果前降支近段或中段临界病变患者中,年龄、病变血管支数为独立危险因素。ROC曲线下面积AUC=0.686,P=0.004,95%置信区间(C/)为0.574~0.798。结论前降支近段或中段临界病变中,年龄、病变血管支数为预测MLA的独立危险因素。 Objective To study the clinical characteristics of the proximal or middle left anterior descending artery intermediate lesions with IVUS examination and further analyze the risk factors affecting the lumen area. Methods 90 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled and their demographic information, medical history and laboratory data were collected for analysis. Simple linear regression analysis was performed to study the risk factor of minimum lumen area (MLA) . Further study with MLA 〈 4.0 mm^2 or ≥4. 0 mm^2 as cutting value was done for determination of risk factors by means of ROC regression method. Results In patients with proximal or middle left anterior descending artery intermediate lesions, age and number of stenotic ressels are the possible risk factors ( both P 〈 0. 05 ) . Taking MLA 〈 4. 0 mm^2 or 〉14. 0 mm^2 as cutting point for assessment of diagnotie value of MLA, the area under ROC curve (AUC) = O. 686, P = O. 004 and 95% CI is (0. 574, 0. 798) . Conclusions Age, number of vessels disease are possible risk factors in predicting the minimum lumen area in the proximal or middle left anterior descending artery intermediate lesions.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2015年第7期371-375,共5页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项(2014-2-4085)
关键词 临界病变 血管内超声 危险因素 Coronary artery intermediate lesions Intravascular uhrasound Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2007,49 : 839-848.
  • 2刘传芬,王伟民,刘健,卢明瑜,马玉良,赵红.血管内超声在冠状动脉临界病变诊断和介入治疗中的应用[J].中国循环杂志,2011,26(1):15-18. 被引量:31
  • 3Schoenhagen P, McErlean ES, Nissen SE. The vulnerable coronary plaque. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2000, 15:1-12.
  • 4Badimon L,Badimon JJ, Vilahur G, et al. Pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndromes and therapeutic implications. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb, 2002,32 : 225-231.
  • 5Dickson BC, Gotlieb AI. Towards understanding acute destabilization of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques. Cardiovasc Pathol, 2003,12:237-248.
  • 6Farb A, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, et al. Pathological mechanisms of fatal late coronary stent thrombosis in humans. Circulation, 2003,108 : 1701-1706.
  • 7Kawasaki M, Sano K, Okubo M, et al. Volumetric quantitative analysis of tissue characteristics of coronaryplaques after statin therapy using three-dimensional integrated baekscatter intravascular ultrasound. JAm Coil Cardiol, 2005, 45: 1946- 1953.
  • 8Takayama T, Hodgson JM. Predictionof the physiologic severity of coronary lesions using 3D IVUS: validation bydirect coronary pressure measurements. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2001, 53 : 48 -55.
  • 9Brugaletta S,Gareia-Gareia HM, Shen ZJ, et al. Morphology of coronary artery lesions assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound tissue characterization and fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2012, 28:221-228.
  • 10顾菲菲,吕树铮,陈韵岱,宋现涛,吴小凡,金泽宁,周玉杰,霍勇.血管内超声技术对不稳定性心绞痛患者冠状动脉临界病变形态学评价[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2011,19(3):125-128. 被引量:6

二级参考文献63

  • 1Tobis J, Azarbal B, Slavin L. Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coil Cardio1,2007, 49:839-848.
  • 2Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coil Cardiol,2001, 57 : 1478-1492.
  • 3Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery" stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol,20O1,87 : 136-141.
  • 4Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, et al. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis. Relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation, 1999,100: 250-522.
  • 5Fernandes MR, Silva GV, Caixeta A, et al. Assessing Intermediate Coronary" Lesions : Angiographic Prediction of Lesion Severity on Intravascular Ultrasound. J Invasive Cardio1,2007,19 : 412-416.
  • 6Sano K, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, et al. Assessing intermediate left main coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound. Am Heart J, 2007, 154 : 983-988.
  • 7Little WC, Constantineseu M, Applegate RJ, et al. Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease? Circulation, 1988,78 : 1157-1166.
  • 8Fishbein MC, Siegel RJ. How big are coronary atherosclerotic plaques that rupture? Circulation, 1996,94 : 2662-2666.
  • 9Jabbour S, Young-Xu Y, Graboys TB, et al. Long-term outcomes of optimized medical management of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol, 2004,93:294-299.
  • 10Iglehart JK. Health care on the hill-Democrats set the agenda. N Engl J Med, 2007,356: 1-4.

共引文献43

同被引文献23

  • 1T0isJ, Azarhal B. SiavinL. Assessment 0 intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laratorv. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49: 839-848.
  • 2Badirmm I,, Badimon J J, ilahur 0, et al. Pathgensis of the acute oronary syndromes and therapeutic implications. Pathphysil Haemost Thromb, 2002, 32:225-231.
  • 3Farh A, Burke AP, Kolorlgie FD, et al. Pathologii al mechanisms of fatal late Coronan,r stent throrahosis irv humans. iroulativn, 200, 108-. 1701-1706.
  • 4Anderson RD, Pepine CJ. (Coronary Angiography: Is it lime to reassess Cirrulation, 2013, 127: 1760-1762.
  • 5Kawasaki M, Sano K, Okuho M, et al. Volumetrir- juiuititative analysis of tissue characteristics of coronary plaques after stalin therapy using three-dimensional integrated backsat(er jntravasMilar ultrasound. J m Coll Caraiol, 2005, 45: 1946-1953.
  • 6Brugalella S, Carcia-Garcia HM, SKen ZJ. et al. M0rphl0g of toronary artery lesions assessed by virlual histology intravascular ultrasound tissue chararlerization anj fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardinvasr Imaging, 2012, 28: 221-228.
  • 7Pijls NH, van Schaardenhurgh P, Manoharan G, al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignifi<-anl stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll (jarrliol, 2007, 49: 2105-2 i 11.
  • 8Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA. et ah Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding permltaneous coronary interven|ion in patienls with mu|tivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year folh'a'-up f the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography fro" mu[tivesse[ evaluation) study. J Am (2011 Cardiol, 2010, 56: 177-184.
  • 9TOnino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. AngiograDhi' versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in lht FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in mallivesseJ evaJuatin. J Am Cll CardM, 2010, 55: 2816-2821.
  • 10Kang S J, Lee JY, Ahn JM, et al. Validation of intravascular ultrasound- derived paramewrs with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc lmerv, 2011.4:65-71.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部