期刊文献+

未成年人运动伤害归责原则的法经济学分析

Analysis on Liability Principle of Juvenile Sports Injury from the Perspective of the Economics of Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过分析未成年人运动伤害事故时,教育机构和未成年学生及其监护人在严格责任和过错责任两种归责原则下的博弈行为选择,可以判断出过错责任原则对教育机构、未成年学生及其监护人的行为进行调整则更有利于社会福利。过错推定原则降低了案件的归责成本,减少了因果关系认定的成本,减少了弱者的举证成本。依据未成年人的年龄、民事行为能力的不同,幼儿园、中小学校或者其他教育机构在运动伤害事故中的侵权责任分别采取过错责任原则和过错责任推定原则是合理的。 By analyzing strict liability and fault liability ofeducational institutions, underage students and their guardians,we may find that the principle of fault liability is more profitable to the society in adjus- ting behaviors. In addition,the principle of fault presumption can lower the cost in judging the case, re- duce the economic burden in identifying causal relationship, and decrease the cost of proof for the weak side. Therefore,according to the age of the underage students and their capacity for civil conduct, it is reasonable for the kindergartens, schools or other educational institutions to adopt the principle of fault liability and the principle of fault presumption in school sports injury accidents.
出处 《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第4期104-108,共5页 Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(09BTY022) 国家社会科学基金项目(11XGL011) 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(HJG2012-261 08A15) 湖南省社会科学基金项目(2010YBB268)
关键词 未成年人 运动伤害 归责原则 法经济学分析 school sports injury accidents liability principle analysis from economics of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1杨立新,马桦.性骚扰行为的侵权责任形态分析[J].法学杂志,2005,26(6):72-74. 被引量:22
  • 2杨立新.《侵权法论》第3版.人民法院出版社,2005年版,第177页.
  • 3王竹.《论法定型不真正连带责任及其在严格责任领域的扩展适用》,《人大法律评论》2009年卷(总第7辑),法律出版社2009年版.
  • 4何勤华,李秀清,陈颐编.《新中国民法典草案总览》上册,法律出版社200B年版,第226页、第243页.
  • 5张新宝,唐青林.《共同侵权责任十论一以责任承担为中心重塑共同侵权理论》,载黄松有主编:《民事审判指导与参考》(总第18集),法律出版社2004年版.
  • 6Dan B. Dobbs, Paul T. Hayden, The Law of Torts 2008 Supplement, Volume 2, Thomson West, 2008, p.189.
  • 7ALl, Restatement of the Law, Third, Torts: Apportionment of Liability, 2000, § 1 Issues and Causes of Action Addressed by I This Restatement, Reporters Notes: Comment c. Special Issues Involving Intentional Torts.
  • 8ALI, Restatement of the Law, Third, Torts: Apportionment of Liability, 2000, § 23 Contribution,Comment 1. Intentional Torts.
  • 9F. Dessemontet and T. Ansay(ed. ), Introduction to Swiss Law ,3rd edition, Kluwer Law International, 2004, p.161.
  • 10W.V.H. Rogers (ed.), Unification of Tort Law: Multiple Tortfeasors, Kluwer Law International, 2004, p.249.

共引文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部