期刊文献+

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of portal pressure in canine liver fibrosis 被引量:4

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for quantitative assessment of portal pressure in canine liver fibrosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To explore the feasibility of non-invasive quantitative estimation of portal venous pressure by contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in a canine model.METHODS: Liver fibrosis was established in adult canines(Beagles; n = 14) by subcutaneous injection of carbon tetrachloride(CCl4). CEUS parameters, including the area under the time-intensity curve and intensity at portal/arterial phases(Qp/Qa and Ip/Ia, respectively), were used to quantitatively assess the blood flow ratio of the portal vein/hepatic artery at multiple time points. The free portal venous pressures(FPP) were measured by a multi-channel baroreceptor using a percutaneous approach at baseline and 8, 16, and 24 wk after CCl4 injections in each canine. Liver biopsies were obtained at the end of 8, 16, and 24 wk from each animal, and the stage of the fibrosis was assessed according to the Metavir scoring system. A Pearson correlation test was performed to compare the FPP with Q p/Q a and I p/I a.RESULTS: Pathologic examination of 42 biopsies from the 14 canines at weeks 8, 16, and 24 revealed that liver fibrosis was induced by CCl4 and represented various stages of liver fibrosis, including F0(n = 3), F1(n = 12), F2(n = 14), F3(n = 11), and F4(n = 2). There were significant differences in the measurements of Qp/Qa(19.85 ± 3.30 vs 10.43 ± 1.21, 9.63 ± 1.03, and 8.77 ± 0.96) and Ip/Ia(1.77 ± 0.37 vs 1.03 ± 0.12, 0.83 ± 0.10, and 0.69 ± 0.13) between control and canine fibrosis at 8, 16, and 24 wk, respectively(all P < 0.001). There were statistically significant negative correlations between FPP and Q p/Q a(r =-0.707, P < 0.001), and between FPP and Ip/Ia(r =-0.759, P < 0.001) in the canine fibrosis model. Prediction of elevated FPP based on Q p/Q a and I p/I a was highly sensitive, as assessed by the area under the receiveroperating curve(0.866 and 0.895, respectively).CONCLUSION: C E U S i s a p o t e n t i a l m e t h o d t o accurately, but non-invasively, estimate portal venous pressure through measurement of Qp/Qa and Ip/Ia parameters. AIM: To explore the feasibility of non-invasive quantitative estimation of portal venous pressure by contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in a canine model.METHODS: Liver fibrosis was established in adult canines(Beagles; n = 14) by subcutaneous injection of carbon tetrachloride(CCl4). CEUS parameters, including the area under the time-intensity curve and intensity at portal/arterial phases(Qp/Qa and Ip/Ia, respectively), were used to quantitatively assess the blood flow ratio of the portal vein/hepatic artery at multiple time points. The free portal venous pressures(FPP) were measured by a multi-channel baroreceptor using a percutaneous approach at baseline and 8, 16, and 24 wk after CCl4 injections in each canine. Liver biopsies were obtained at the end of 8, 16, and 24 wk from each animal, and the stage of the fibrosis was assessed according to the Metavir scoring system. A Pearson correlation test was performed to compare the FPP with Q p/Q a and I p/I a.RESULTS: Pathologic examination of 42 biopsies from the 14 canines at weeks 8, 16, and 24 revealed that liver fibrosis was induced by CCl4 and represented various stages of liver fibrosis, including F0(n = 3), F1(n = 12), F2(n = 14), F3(n = 11), and F4(n = 2). There were significant differences in the measurements of Qp/Qa(19.85 ± 3.30 vs 10.43 ± 1.21, 9.63 ± 1.03, and 8.77 ± 0.96) and Ip/Ia(1.77 ± 0.37 vs 1.03 ± 0.12, 0.83 ± 0.10, and 0.69 ± 0.13) between control and canine fibrosis at 8, 16, and 24 wk, respectively(all P < 0.001). There were statistically significant negative correlations between FPP and Q p/Q a(r =-0.707, P < 0.001), and between FPP and Ip/Ia(r =-0.759, P < 0.001) in the canine fibrosis model. Prediction of elevated FPP based on Q p/Q a and I p/I a was highly sensitive, as assessed by the area under the receiveroperating curve(0.866 and 0.895, respectively).CONCLUSION: C E U S i s a p o t e n t i a l m e t h o d t o accurately, but non-invasively, estimate portal venous pressure through measurement of Qp/Qa and Ip/Ia parameters.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第15期4509-4516,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Animal model CONTRAST-ENHANCED ultrasound Liver FIBROSIS NONINVASIVE technique PORTAL venouspressure Animal model Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver fibrosis Noninvasive technique Portal venous pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献15

  • 1李家平,陈伟,黄勇慧,杨建勇.肝脏CT灌注成像测定肝有效血流量的准确性与可重复性研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(1):51-54. 被引量:18
  • 2Baik S K,Kim J W,Kim H S,et al.Doppler US hepatic vein waveform in assessment of severity of portal hypertension and vasoactive drug response[J].Radiology,2006,240(2):574-580.
  • 3Rodriguez-Vilarrupla A,Femdndez M,Bosch J,et al.Current concepts on the pathophysiology of portal hypertension[J].Annals of Hepatol,2007,6(1):28-36.
  • 4Dib N,Oberti F,Cales P.Current management of the complications of portal hypertension:variceal bleeding and ascites[J].CMAJ.2006,174(10):1433-1443.
  • 5Blomley M J,Coulden R,Dawson P,et al.Liver perfusion studied with ultrafast CT[J].Comput Assist Tomogr,1995,19 (3):424-433.
  • 6Tsushima Y,Blomley M J,Yokoyama H,et al.Does the presence of distant and local malignancy alter parenchymal perfusion in apparently disease-free areas of the liver[J]? Dig Dis Sci,2001,46(10):2113-2119.
  • 7吴阶平 裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M]6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.1074.
  • 8Moriyasu F, Nishida O, Ban N, et al. Measurement of portal vascular resistance in patients with portal hypertension.Gastroenterology, 1986, 90: 710-717.
  • 9Zimmermann A, Zhao D, Reichen J. Myofibroblasts in the cirrhotic rat liver reflect hepatic remodeling and correlate with fibrosis and sinusoidal capillaryization. J Hepatol, 1999, 30: 646-652.
  • 10Lu X, Liu P, Xu GF, et al . The role of hepatic sinusoid capillarization during the formation of portal hypertension in fibrotic rats induced by dimethylnitrosamine. Chin J Hepatol, 2003,11:595-598.陆雄,刘平,徐光福,等.肝

共引文献9

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部