期刊文献+

Comparison of two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma 被引量:1

Comparison of two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To compare two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma.METHODS:Thirty New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into two groups:A and B.Group A was assigned a traditional laparotomy method(embedding tumor fragments directly into the liver with tweezers).Group B was subjected to an improved laparotomy method(injection of tumor fragments into the liver through a 15 G syringe needle).The operation time, incision length, incision infection rate, and mortality rate were compared between the two groups after laparotomy.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) was performed to evaluate tumor formation rates and the characteristics of the tumors 2 wk after laparotomy.RESULTS:The mean operation times for the two groups(Group A vs Group B) were 23.2 ± 3.4 min vs 17.5 ± 2.9 min(P < 0.05); the incision length was 3.3 ± 0.5 cm vs 2.4 ± 0.6 cm(P < 0.05); and the mortality rate after 2 wk was 26.7% vs 0%(P < 0.05); all of these outcomes were significantly different between the two groups.The incision infection rates in the two groups were 6.7% vs 0%(P > 0.05), whichwere not significantly different.MRI performed after 2weeks showed that the tumor formation rates in the two groups were 90.9%vs 93.3%(P>0.05).These rates were not significantly different between the two groups.The celiac implantation rate and abdominal wall metastasis rate in the two groups were 36.4%vs 13.3%(P<0.05)and 27.2%vs 6.7%(P<0.05),respectively,which were significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION:The tumor formation rates were not significantly different between the two methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma.However,the improved method is recommended because it has certain advantages. AIM:To compare two different laparotomy methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma.METHODS:Thirty New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into two groups:A and B.Group A was assigned a traditional laparotomy method(embedding tumor fragments directly into the liver with tweezers).Group B was subjected to an improved laparotomy method(injection of tumor fragments into the liver through a 15 G syringe needle).The operation time, incision length, incision infection rate, and mortality rate were compared between the two groups after laparotomy.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) was performed to evaluate tumor formation rates and the characteristics of the tumors 2 wk after laparotomy.RESULTS:The mean operation times for the two groups(Group A vs Group B) were 23.2 ± 3.4 min vs 17.5 ± 2.9 min(P < 0.05); the incision length was 3.3 ± 0.5 cm vs 2.4 ± 0.6 cm(P < 0.05); and the mortality rate after 2 wk was 26.7% vs 0%(P < 0.05); all of these outcomes were significantly different between the two groups.The incision infection rates in the two groups were 6.7% vs 0%(P > 0.05), whichwere not significantly different.MRI performed after 2weeks showed that the tumor formation rates in the two groups were 90.9%vs 93.3%(P>0.05).These rates were not significantly different between the two groups.The celiac implantation rate and abdominal wall metastasis rate in the two groups were 36.4%vs 13.3%(P<0.05)and 27.2%vs 6.7%(P<0.05),respectively,which were significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION:The tumor formation rates were not significantly different between the two methods for modeling rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma.However,the improved method is recommended because it has certain advantages.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第16期4875-4882,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province,China,No.14JJ2034 Project of the Development and Reform Commission of Hunan Province,China,No.2013-1199 Project of the Science and Technology Department of Hunan Province,China,No.2014TT2017
关键词 RABBIT VX2 HEPATOCARCINOMA LAPAROTOMY MODELING Magnetic RESONANCE imaging Rabbit VX2 hepatocarcinoma Laparotomy Modeling Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献42

  • 1Akira Kobayashi,Shinichi Miyagawa.Advances in therapeutics for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology,2010,2(10):380-389. 被引量:2
  • 2佘军军,王子明,车向明,潘承恩.β-榄香烯介入治疗兔VX2肾移植癌的实验研究[J].中西医结合学报,2006,4(6):611-614. 被引量:2
  • 3刘春梅,陈锦云,柯丹,徐杰,雷令,李发琪,王智彪.工作周期对脉冲高强度聚焦超声辐照离体牛肝的影响[J].中国超声医学杂志,2007,23(8):567-569. 被引量:8
  • 4Stangl R,Altendorf-Hofmann A,Chamley RM,et al.Factors influencing the natural history of colorectal liver metastasesThe Lancet,1994.
  • 5Jemal A,Center MM,DeSantis C,Ward EM.Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention . 2010
  • 6Stéphane Benoist MD, PhD,Bernard Nordlinger MD.The Role of Preoperative Chemotherapy in Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases[J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology . 2009 (9)
  • 7Tomlinson JS,Jarnagin WR,DeMatteo RP,Fong Y,Korn- prat P,Gonen M,Kemeny N,Brennan MF,Blumgart LH,D’’Angelica M.Actual 10-year survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases defines cure. Journal of Clinical Oncology . 2007
  • 8Simmonds P.C,Primrose J.N,Colquitt J.L,Garden O.J,Poston G.J,Rees M.Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. British Journal of Cancer . 2006
  • 9Ting Luo,Hua-Mei Yan,Ping He,Yong Luo,Yuan-Fu Yang,Hong Zheng.Aspirin use and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis[J]. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment . 2012 (2)
  • 10Alexander T,Swistel MD,James R,et al.Intraarterial versus intravenous adrimaycin in the rabbit Vx2 tumor system. Cancer . 1984

共引文献5

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部