期刊文献+

Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus

Improved specimen adequacy using jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To assess the sampling quality of four different forceps(three large capacity and one jumbo) in patients with Barrett's esophagus.METHODS:This was a prospective,single-blind study.A total of 37 patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled.Targeted or random biopsies with all four forceps were obtained from each patient using a diagnostic endoscope during a single endoscopy.The following forceps were tested:A:FB-220 K disposable large capacity;B:BI01-D3-23 reusable large capacity;C:GBF-02-23-180 disposable large capacity;and jumbo:disposable Radial Jaw 4 jumbo.The primary outcome measurement was specimen adequacy,defined as a well-oriented biopsy sample 2 mm or greater with the presence of muscularis mucosa.RESULTS:A total of 436 biopsy samples were analyzed.We found a significantly higher proportion of adequate biopsy samples with jumbo forceps(71%)(P < 0.001 vs forceps A:26%,forceps B:17%,and forceps C:18%).Biopsies with jumbo forceps had the largest diameter(median 2.4 mm)(P < 0.001 vs forceps A:2 mm,forceps B:1.6 mm,and forceps C:2mm).There was a trend for higher diagnostic yield per biopsy with jumbo forceps(forceps A:0.20,forceps B:0.22,forceps C:0.27,and jumbo:0.28).No complications related to specimen sampling were observed with any of the four tested forceps.CONCLUSION:Jumbo biopsy forceps,when used with a diagnostic endoscope,provide more adequate specimens as compared to large-capacity forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus. AIM:To assess the sampling quality of four different forceps(three large capacity and one jumbo) in patients with Barrett's esophagus.METHODS:This was a prospective,single-blind study.A total of 37 patients with Barrett's esophagus were enrolled.Targeted or random biopsies with all four forceps were obtained from each patient using a diagnostic endoscope during a single endoscopy.The following forceps were tested:A:FB-220 K disposable large capacity;B:BI01-D3-23 reusable large capacity;C:GBF-02-23-180 disposable large capacity;and jumbo:disposable Radial Jaw 4 jumbo.The primary outcome measurement was specimen adequacy,defined as a well-oriented biopsy sample 2 mm or greater with the presence of muscularis mucosa.RESULTS:A total of 436 biopsy samples were analyzed.We found a significantly higher proportion of adequate biopsy samples with jumbo forceps(71%)(P < 0.001 vs forceps A:26%,forceps B:17%,and forceps C:18%).Biopsies with jumbo forceps had the largest diameter(median 2.4 mm)(P < 0.001 vs forceps A:2 mm,forceps B:1.6 mm,and forceps C:2mm).There was a trend for higher diagnostic yield per biopsy with jumbo forceps(forceps A:0.20,forceps B:0.22,forceps C:0.27,and jumbo:0.28).No complications related to specimen sampling were observed with any of the four tested forceps.CONCLUSION:Jumbo biopsy forceps,when used with a diagnostic endoscope,provide more adequate specimens as compared to large-capacity forceps in patients with Barrett's esophagus.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第17期5328-5335,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Czech Health Ministry,No.IGA NT/13636
关键词 Barrett's ESOPHAGUS Barrett's esophagusrelatedneoplasia Biopsy FORCEPS JUMBO FORCEPS SPECIMEN ADEQUACY Barrett's esophagus Barrett's esophagusrelated neoplasia Biopsy forceps Jumbo forceps Specimen adequacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, ShaheenNJ. American Gastroenterological Association medicalposition statement on the management of Barrett‘s esophagus.Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1084-1091 [PMID: 21376940 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.030].
  • 2Evans JA, Early DS, Fukami N, Ben-Menachem T, ChandrasekharaV, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Foley KQ,Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Lightdale J, Malpas PM,Maple JT, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Sharaf RN, Shergill A, DominitzJA, Cash BD. The role of endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus andother premalignant conditions of the esophagus. GastrointestEndosc 2012; 76: 1087-1094 [PMID: 23164510 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.004].
  • 3Canto MI, Anandasabapathy S, Brugge W, Falk GW, Dunbar KB,Zhang Z, Woods K, Almario JA, Schell U, Goldblum J, Maitra A,Montgomery E, Kiesslich R. In vivo endomicroscopy improvesdetection of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: a multicenterinternational randomized controlled trial (with video). GastrointestEndosc 2014; 79: 211-221 [PMID: 24219822 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.020].
  • 4Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, Ang Y, Kang JY, WatsonP, Trudgill N, Patel P, Kaye PV, Sanders S, O'Donovan M, Bird-Lieberman E, Bhandari P, Jankowski JA, Attwood S, Parsons SL,Loft D, Lagergren J, Moayyedi P, Lyratzopoulos G, de Caestecker J.British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis andmanagement of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63: 7-42 [PMID:24165758 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372].
  • 5Komanduri S, Swanson G, Keefer L, Jakate S. Use of a newjumbo forceps improves tissue acquisition of Barrett's esophagussurveillance biopsies. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1072-8.e1[PMID: 19595312 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.04.009].
  • 6Buscaglia JM, Nagula S, Jayaraman V, Robbins DH, Vadada D, GrossSA, DiMaio CJ, Pais S, Patel K, Sejpal DV, Kim MK. Diagnosticyield and safety of jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with subepitheliallesions of the upper and lower GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:1147-1152 [PMID: 22425270 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.032].
  • 7Korst RJ, Santana-Joseph S, Rutledge JR, Antler A, Bethala V,DeLillo A, Kutner D, Lee BE, Pazwash H, Pittman RH, Rahmin M,Rubinoff M. Patterns of recurrent and persistent intestinal metaplasiaafter successful radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 1529-1534 [PMID: 23219501DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.11.016].
  • 8Elmunzer BJ, Higgins PD, Kwon YM, Golembeski C, Greenson JK,Korsnes SJ, Elta GH. Jumbo forceps are superior to standard largecapacityforceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatorybowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens. Gastrointest Endosc2008; 68: 273-278; quiz 334, 336 [PMID: 18155204 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.023].
  • 9Draganov PV, Chang MN, Alkhasawneh A, Dixon LR, Lieb J,Moshiree B, Polyak S, Sultan S, Collins D, Suman A, ValentineJF, Wagh MS, Habashi SL, Forsmark CE. Randomized, controlledtrial of standard, large-capacity versus jumbo biopsy forceps forpolypectomy of small, sessile, colorectal polyps. GastrointestEndosc 2012; 75: 118-126 [PMID: 22196811 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.019].
  • 10Falk GW, Rice TW, Goldblum JR, Richter JE. Jumbo biopsyforceps protocol still misses unsuspected cancer in Barrett'sesophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:170-176 [PMID: 9925694 DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70482-7].

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部