期刊文献+

Cholangiographic characteristics of common bile duct dilatation in children 被引量:1

Cholangiographic characteristics of common bile duct dilatation in children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigate whether children with congenital common bile duct dilatation(CBDD) differ from children with obstructive CBDD in cholangiographic characteristics.METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the baseline data and the results of imaging analyses were reviewed among children who had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) due to CBDD. ERCP was performed on all pediatric patients by experienced pediatric endoscopists. The maximal transverse diameter of the common bile duct(CBD) was measured on ERCP. To assess whether ageadjusted CBDD could be used for differential diagnosis, a CBDD severity index(SI) was calculated by dividing the measured CBD diameter by the age-corrected maximal diameter of a normal CBD. RESULTS: A retrospective medical chart review revealed that 85 consecutive children under 16 years of age with hepatobiliary disease and CBDD were referred to Seoul Asan Medical Center. Fiftyfive(64.7%) children had congenital CBDD and 30(35.3%) had obstructive CBDD. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of clinical characteristics except for sex. The congenital and obstructive CBDD groups did not differ significantly in terms of mean CBD diameter(19.3 ± 9.6 mm vs 12.2 ± 4.1 mm, P > 0.05). However, congenital CBDD cases had a significantly higher mean SI than obstructive CBDD cases(3.62 ± 1.64 vs 1.98 ± 0.71, P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, an SI value ≥ 2.32 and comorbidity with anomalous union of pancreaticobiliary duct(APBDU) in ERCP independently predicted congenital CBDD.CONCLUSION: Measuring the CBD may aid the differential diagnosis of both CBDD and APBDU in children. AIM: To investigate whether children with congenital common bile duct dilatation(CBDD) differ from children with obstructive CBDD in cholangiographic characteristics.METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the baseline data and the results of imaging analyses were reviewed among children who had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) due to CBDD. ERCP was performed on all pediatric patients by experienced pediatric endoscopists. The maximal transverse diameter of the common bile duct(CBD) was measured on ERCP. To assess whether ageadjusted CBDD could be used for differential diagnosis, a CBDD severity index(SI) was calculated by dividing the measured CBD diameter by the age-corrected maximal diameter of a normal CBD. RESULTS: A retrospective medical chart review revealed that 85 consecutive children under 16 years of age with hepatobiliary disease and CBDD were referred to Seoul Asan Medical Center. Fiftyfive(64.7%) children had congenital CBDD and 30(35.3%) had obstructive CBDD. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of clinical characteristics except for sex. The congenital and obstructive CBDD groups did not differ significantly in terms of mean CBD diameter(19.3 ± 9.6 mm vs 12.2 ± 4.1 mm, P > 0.05). However, congenital CBDD cases had a significantly higher mean SI than obstructive CBDD cases(3.62 ± 1.64 vs 1.98 ± 0.71, P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, an SI value ≥ 2.32 and comorbidity with anomalous union of pancreaticobiliary duct(APBDU) in ERCP independently predicted congenital CBDD.CONCLUSION: Measuring the CBD may aid the differential diagnosis of both CBDD and APBDU in children.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第20期6229-6235,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Endoscopic RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY Common BILE duct Choledochal CYST Choledolithiasis CHILDREN Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Common bile duct Choledochal cyst Choledolithiasis Children
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Coss A, Enns R. The investigation of unexplained biliary dilatation.Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2009; 11: 155-159 [PMID: 19281704DOI: 10.1007/s11894-009-0024-4].
  • 2Holm AN, Gerke H. What should be done with a dilated bile duct-Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2010; 12: 150-156 [PMID: 20424988DOI: 10.1007/s11894-010-0094-3].
  • 3Brown CW, Werlin SL, Geenen JE, Schmalz M. Thediagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography in children. J Pediatr GastroenterolNutr 1993; 17: 19-23 [PMID: 8350208 DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199307000-00003].
  • 4Cheng CL, Fogel EL, Sherman S, McHenry L, Watkins JL,Croffie JM, Gupta SK, Fitzgerald JF, Lazzell-Pannell L, SchmidtS, Lehman GA. Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography in children: a large series report. JPediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005; 41: 445-453 [PMID: 16205513DOI: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000177311.81071.13].
  • 5Otto AK, Neal MD, Slivka AN, Kane TD. An appraisal ofendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) forpancreaticobiliary disease in children: our institutional experiencein 231 cases. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2536-2540 [PMID: 21359895DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1582-8].
  • 6Jang JY, Yoon CH, Kim KM. Endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography in pancreatic and biliary tract disease inKorean children. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 490-495 [PMID:20101777 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i4.490].
  • 7Ashida K, Nagita A, Sakaguchi M, Amemoto K, Tada H.Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in paediatricpatients with biliary disorders. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;13: 598-603 [PMID: 9715403 DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1998.tb00697.x].
  • 8Miyano T, Ando K, Yamataka A, Lane G, Segawa O, KohnoS, Fujiwara T. Pancreaticobiliary maljunction associated withnondilatation or minimal dilatation of the common bile duct inchildren: diagnosis and treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1996; 6:334-337 [PMID: 9007465 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071009].
  • 9Huang CS, Huang CC, Chen DF. Choledochal cysts: differencesbetween pediatric and adult patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14:1105-1110 [PMID: 20422306 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1209-8].
  • 10Matsumoto Y, Uchida K, Nakase A, Honjo I. Congenital cysticdilatation of the common bile duct as a cause of primary bile ductstone. Am J Surg 1977; 134: 346-352 [PMID: 900336 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(77)90436-6].

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部