期刊文献+

Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 被引量:1

Lymph node ratio-based staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To analyze a modified staging system utilizing lymph node ratio(LNR) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).METHODS: Clinical data of 2011 patients with ESCC who underwent surgical resection alone between January 1995 and June 2010 at the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College were reviewed. The LNR, or node ratio(Nr) was defined as the ratio of metastatic LNs ompared to the total number of resected LNs. Overall survival between groups was compared with the log-rank test. The cutoff point of LNR was established by grouping patients with 10% increment in Nr, and then combining the neighborhood survival curves using the log-rank test. A new TNr M staging system, was constructed by replacing the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) N categories with the Nr categories in the new TNM staging system. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the seventh edition AJCC staging system and the TNr M staging system.RESULTS: The median number of resected LNs was 12(range: 4-44), and 25% and 75% interquartilerangeswere8 and 16. Patients were classified into four Nr categories with distinctive survival differences(Nr0: LNR = 0; Nr1: 0% < LNR ≤ 10%; Nr2: 10% < LNR ≤ 20%; and Nr3: LNR > 20%). From N categories to Nr categories, 557 patients changed their LN stage. The median survival time(MST) for the four Nr categories(Nr0-Nr3) was 155.0 mo, 39.0 mo, 28.0 mo, and 19.0 mo, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival was 61.1%, 41.1%, 33.0%, and 22.9%, respectively(P < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly different for the AJCC N categories when patients were subgrouped into 15 or more vs fewer than 15 examined nodes, except for the N3 category(P = 0.292). However, overall survival was similar when the patients in all four Nr categories were subgrouped into 15 or more vs fewer than 15 nodes. Using the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic, we found that the Nr category and TNr M stage had higher accuracy in predicting survival than the AJCC N category and TNM stage. CONCLUSION: A staging system based on LNR may have better prognostic stratification of patients with ESCC than the current TNM system, especially for those undergoing limited lymphadenectomy. AIM: To analyze a modified staging system utilizing lymph node ratio(LNR) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).METHODS: Clinical data of 2011 patients with ESCC who underwent surgical resection alone between January 1995 and June 2010 at the Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College were reviewed. The LNR, or node ratio(Nr) was defined as the ratio of metastatic LNs ompared to the total number of resected LNs. Overall survival between groups was compared with the log-rank test. The cutoff point of LNR was established by grouping patients with 10% increment in Nr, and then combining the neighborhood survival curves using the log-rank test. A new TNr M staging system, was constructed by replacing the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC) N categories with the Nr categories in the new TNM staging system. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the seventh edition AJCC staging system and the TNr M staging system.RESULTS: The median number of resected LNs was 12(range: 4-44), and 25% and 75% interquartilerangeswere8 and 16. Patients were classified into four Nr categories with distinctive survival differences(Nr0: LNR = 0; Nr1: 0% < LNR ≤ 10%; Nr2: 10% < LNR ≤ 20%; and Nr3: LNR > 20%). From N categories to Nr categories, 557 patients changed their LN stage. The median survival time(MST) for the four Nr categories(Nr0-Nr3) was 155.0 mo, 39.0 mo, 28.0 mo, and 19.0 mo, respectively, and the 5-year overall survival was 61.1%, 41.1%, 33.0%, and 22.9%, respectively(P < 0.001). Overall survival was significantly different for the AJCC N categories when patients were subgrouped into 15 or more vs fewer than 15 examined nodes, except for the N3 category(P = 0.292). However, overall survival was similar when the patients in all four Nr categories were subgrouped into 15 or more vs fewer than 15 nodes. Using the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic, we found that the Nr category and TNr M stage had higher accuracy in predicting survival than the AJCC N category and TNM stage. CONCLUSION: A staging system based on LNR may have better prognostic stratification of patients with ESCC than the current TNM system, especially for those undergoing limited lymphadenectomy.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第24期7514-7521,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Cancer STAGING ESOPHAGECTOMY Esophagealsquamous cell CARCINOMA LYMPH NODE ratio Prognosis Cancer staging Esophagectomy Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Lymph node ratio Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Globalcancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90 [PMID:21296855 DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107].
  • 2Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA CancerJ Clin 2015; 65: 5-29 [PMID: 25559415 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21254].
  • 3Castoro C, Scarpa M, Cagol M, Ruol A, Cavallin F, Alfieri R,Zanchettin G, Rugge M, Ancona E. Nodal metastasis from locallyadvanced esophageal cancer: how neoadjuvant therapy modifiestheir frequency and distribution. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18:3743-3754 [PMID: 21556952 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1753-9].
  • 4Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, Allen MS, ChenLQ, Hunter JG, Kesler KA, Law S, Lerut TE, Reed CE, Salo JA,Scott WJ, Swisher SG, Watson TJ, Blackstone EH. Worldwideesophageal cancer collaboration. Dis Esophagus 2009; 22: 1-8[PMID: 19196264 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00901.x].
  • 5Wang J, Dang P, Raut CP, Pandalai PK, Maduekwe UN, RattnerDW, Lauwers GY, Yoon SS. Comparison of a lymph node ratiobasedstaging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastriccancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database.Ann Surg 2012; 255: 478-485 [PMID: 22330040 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824857e2].
  • 6Bogoevski D, Onken F, Koenig A, Kaifi JT, Schurr P, Sauter G,Izbicki JR, Yekebas EF. Is it time for a new TNM classificationin esophageal carcinoma- Ann Surg 2008; 247: 633-641 [PMID:18362626 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181656d07].
  • 7Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, Divino CM, Packer S,Wisnivesky JP. Prognostic significance of the number of lymph nodemetastases in esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 206: 239-246[PMID: 18222375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.09.003].
  • 8Kelty CJ, Kennedy CW, Falk GL. Ratio of metastatic lymph nodesto total number of nodes resected is prognostic for survival inesophageal carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5: 1467-1471 [PMID:20812404 DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181e8f6b1].
  • 9Dhar DK, Hattori S, Tonomoto Y, Shimoda T, Kato H, TachibanaM, Matsuura K, Mitsumoto Y, Little AG, Nagasue N. Appraisal of arevised lymph node classification system for esophageal squamouscell cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 1265-1272 [PMID: 17383324DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.003].
  • 10Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, Matsuda G, Otsuka Y, OnoHA, Shimada H. Developing an appropriate staging system foresophageal carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 2005; 201: 884-890 [PMID:16310691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.07.002].

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部