期刊文献+

Tissue resonance interaction accurately detects colon lesions: A double-blind pilot study

Tissue resonance interaction accurately detects colon lesions: A double-blind pilot study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigated the performance of the tissue resonance interaction method(TRIM) for the noninvasive detection of colon lesions.METHODS: We performed a prospective single-center blinded pilot study of consecutive adults undergoing colonoscopy at the University Hospital in Sassari, Italy. Before patients underwent colonoscopy, they were examined by the TRIMprobe which detects differences in electromagnetic properties between pathological and normal tissues. All patients had completed the polyethylene glycol-containing bowel prep for the colonoscopy procedure before being screened. During the procedure the subjects remained fully dressed. A hand-held probe was moved over the abdomen and variations in electromagnetic signals were recorded for 3 spectral lines(462-465 MHz, 930 MHz, and 1395 MHz). A single investigator, blind to any clinical information, performed the test using the TRIMprob system. Abnormal signals were identified and recordedas malignant or benign(adenoma or hyperplastic polyps). Findings were compared with those from colonoscopy with histologic confirmation. Statistical analysis was performed by χ2 test.RESULTS: A total of 305 consecutive patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled over a period of 12 months. The most frequent indication for colonoscopy w a s a b d o m i n a l p a i n( 3 3 %). T h e T R I M p r o b w a s well accepted by all patients; none spontaneously complained about the procedure, and no adverse effects were observed. TRIM proved inaccurate for polyp detection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) and they were excluded leaving 281 subjects(mean age 59 ± 13 years; 107 males). The TRIM detected and accurately characterized all 12 adenocarcinomas and 135/137 polyps(98.5%) including 64 adenomatous(100%) found. The method identified cancers and polyps with 98.7% sensitivity, 96.2% specificity, and 97.5% diagnostic accuracy, compared to colonoscopy and histology analyses. The positive predictive value was 96.7% and the negative predictive value 98.4%. Among the 281 non-IBD subjects, there were 7 cases with discordant results(2.5%) between TRIMprob and the reference standard including 5 false positive results(1.8%) and 2 false negative(0.7%) results. The main limitation of the TRIMprob system is the need for trained operators.CONCLUSION: The study confirmed that TRIM provides rapid, accurate, convenient and noninvasive means to identify individuals most likely to benefit from colonoscopy. AIM: To investigated the performance of the tissue resonance interaction method(TRIM) for the noninvasive detection of colon lesions.METHODS: We performed a prospective single-center blinded pilot study of consecutive adults undergoing colonoscopy at the University Hospital in Sassari, Italy. Before patients underwent colonoscopy, they were examined by the TRIMprobe which detects differences in electromagnetic properties between pathological and normal tissues. All patients had completed the polyethylene glycol-containing bowel prep for the colonoscopy procedure before being screened. During the procedure the subjects remained fully dressed. A hand-held probe was moved over the abdomen and variations in electromagnetic signals were recorded for 3 spectral lines(462-465 MHz, 930 MHz, and 1395 MHz). A single investigator, blind to any clinical information, performed the test using the TRIMprob system. Abnormal signals were identified and recordedas malignant or benign(adenoma or hyperplastic polyps). Findings were compared with those from colonoscopy with histologic confirmation. Statistical analysis was performed by χ2 test.RESULTS: A total of 305 consecutive patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled over a period of 12 months. The most frequent indication for colonoscopy w a s a b d o m i n a l p a i n( 3 3 %). T h e T R I M p r o b w a s well accepted by all patients; none spontaneously complained about the procedure, and no adverse effects were observed. TRIM proved inaccurate for polyp detection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) and they were excluded leaving 281 subjects(mean age 59 ± 13 years; 107 males). The TRIM detected and accurately characterized all 12 adenocarcinomas and 135/137 polyps(98.5%) including 64 adenomatous(100%) found. The method identified cancers and polyps with 98.7% sensitivity, 96.2% specificity, and 97.5% diagnostic accuracy, compared to colonoscopy and histology analyses. The positive predictive value was 96.7% and the negative predictive value 98.4%. Among the 281 non-IBD subjects, there were 7 cases with discordant results(2.5%) between TRIMprob and the reference standard including 5 false positive results(1.8%) and 2 false negative(0.7%) results. The main limitation of the TRIMprob system is the need for trained operators.CONCLUSION: The study confirmed that TRIM provides rapid, accurate, convenient and noninvasive means to identify individuals most likely to benefit from colonoscopy.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第25期7851-7859,共9页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 COLON cancer SCREENING Bioscanner noninvasivediagnosis ELECTROMAGNETIC RESONANCE Colon cancer screening Bioscanner non-invasive diagnosis Electromagnetic Resonance
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Globalcancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90 [PMID:21296855 DOI: 10.3322/caac.20107].
  • 2Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CACancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30 [PMID: 23335087 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21166].
  • 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use ofcolorectal cancer tests--United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWRMorb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57: 253-258 [PMID: 18340331].
  • 4Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D,Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD,Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, WinawerSJ. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectalcancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline fromthe American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Forceon Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1570-1595 [PMID: 18384785 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002].
  • 5Henley SJ, King JB, German RR, Richardson LC, Plescia M;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Surveillanceof screening-detected cancers (colon and rectum, breast, andcervix) - United States, 2004-2006. MMWR Surveill Summ 2010;59: 1-25 [PMID: 21102407].
  • 6Stock C, Brenner H. Utilization of lower gastrointestinalendoscopy and fecal occult blood test in 11 European countries:evidence from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirementin Europe (SHARE). Endoscopy 2010; 42: 546-556 [PMID:20432204 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244127].
  • 7Ahlquist DA, Sargent DJ, Loprinzi CL, Levin TR, Rex DK,Ahnen DJ, Knigge K, Lance MP, Burgart LJ, Hamilton SR, AllisonJE, Lawson MJ, Devens ME, Harrington JJ, Hillman SL. StoolDNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectalneoplasia. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 441-450, W81 [PMID:18838724 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-7-200810070-00004].
  • 8Vedruccio C, Meessen A. EM cancer detection by means of nonlinear resonance interaction. In: Proceedings PIERS progress inelectromagnetics research symposium. Italy: Pisa, 2004: 909-912.
  • 9Bellorofonte C, Vedruccio C, Tombolini P, Ruoppolo M, TubaroA. Non-invasive detection of prostate cancer by electromagneticinteraction. Eur Urol 2005; 47: 29-37; discussion 37 [PMID:15582246 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2004.09.012].
  • 10Brenan KE, Campbell SL, Campbell SLV, Petzold LR. Numericalsolution of initial-value problems in differential algebraicequations. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial Mathematics, 1996.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部