期刊文献+

Parameters affecting different acoustic radiation force impulse applications in the diagnosis of fibrotic liver changes 被引量:5

Parameters affecting different acoustic radiation force impulse applications in the diagnosis of fibrotic liver changes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To analyze the virtual touch tissue quantification(VTTQ) and virtual touch imaging quantification(VTIQ) techniques, and identify possible factors that may influence VTTQ and VTIQ measurements.METHODS: One hundred and eighty-six(104 women/82 men) of 323 subjects met the inclusion criteria(age > 18 years, no history of chronic or gastrointestinal disease, body-mass index(BMI) < 30 kg/m2, a fasting period of at least three hours, no history of hepatotoxic pharmaceuticals, alcohol consumption < 24 g/d in men and < 12 g/d in women, and normal findings upon ultrasound examination of the abdomen). Measurements were taken at depths of 50 mm with VTTQ, 15 mm and 25 mm with VTIQ in the right hepatic lobe, and at 15 mm with only VTIQ in the left hepatic lobe. The examiner acquired six measurements per position, thereby giving 24 measurements in total.RESULTS: The 95% confidence intervals of mean were1.23-1.29 m/s for VTTQ and 1.29-1.37 m/s, 1.17-1.23 m/s, and 1.48-1.57 m/s for VTIQ in a depth of 15 mm and 25 mm in the right hepatic lobe and 15 mm in the left hepatic lobe. Only superficial measurements in the right hepatic lobe with the VTIQ method exhibited an effect of age on shear wave velocity. Measurements acquired using the 6C1 probe with the VTTQ method showed no dependence on BMI. By comparison, BMI influenced measurements taken with the VTIQ method using the 9L4 probe in the superficial and deep areas of the right hepatic lobe, as well as in the left hepatic lobe(P = 0.0160, P = 0.0019, P = 0.0173, respectively). Gender influenced measurements at depths of 50 mm with VTTQ and 25 mm with VTIQ in the right hepatic lobe(P = 0.0001, P = 0.0269). Significant differences were found between measurements with the 6C1(VTTQ) and 9L4 probes(VTIQ)(P = 0.0067), between superficial and deep measurements(P < 0.0001), and between the right and left lobes of the liver(P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Measurements in the right lobe and deep regions are preferable. Gender differences must be considered. BMI must be considered when assessing VTIQ technology. AIM: To analyze the virtual touch tissue quantification(VTTQ) and virtual touch imaging quantification(VTIQ) techniques, and identify possible factors that may influence VTTQ and VTIQ measurements.METHODS: One hundred and eighty-six(104 women/82 men) of 323 subjects met the inclusion criteria(age > 18 years, no history of chronic or gastrointestinal disease, body-mass index(BMI) < 30 kg/m2, a fasting period of at least three hours, no history of hepatotoxic pharmaceuticals, alcohol consumption < 24 g/d in men and < 12 g/d in women, and normal findings upon ultrasound examination of the abdomen). Measurements were taken at depths of 50 mm with VTTQ, 15 mm and 25 mm with VTIQ in the right hepatic lobe, and at 15 mm with only VTIQ in the left hepatic lobe. The examiner acquired six measurements per position, thereby giving 24 measurements in total.RESULTS: The 95% confidence intervals of mean were1.23-1.29 m/s for VTTQ and 1.29-1.37 m/s, 1.17-1.23 m/s, and 1.48-1.57 m/s for VTIQ in a depth of 15 mm and 25 mm in the right hepatic lobe and 15 mm in the left hepatic lobe. Only superficial measurements in the right hepatic lobe with the VTIQ method exhibited an effect of age on shear wave velocity. Measurements acquired using the 6C1 probe with the VTTQ method showed no dependence on BMI. By comparison, BMI influenced measurements taken with the VTIQ method using the 9L4 probe in the superficial and deep areas of the right hepatic lobe, as well as in the left hepatic lobe(P = 0.0160, P = 0.0019, P = 0.0173, respectively). Gender influenced measurements at depths of 50 mm with VTTQ and 25 mm with VTIQ in the right hepatic lobe(P = 0.0001, P = 0.0269). Significant differences were found between measurements with the 6C1(VTTQ) and 9L4 probes(VTIQ)(P = 0.0067), between superficial and deep measurements(P < 0.0001), and between the right and left lobes of the liver(P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Measurements in the right lobe and deep regions are preferable. Gender differences must be considered. BMI must be considered when assessing VTIQ technology.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第27期8425-8432,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Acoustic radiation force IMPULSE Elasticityimaging techniques LIVER Reference STANDARDS Virtualtouch imaging and quantification Virtual TOUCH tissuequantification ULTRASONOGRAPHY Acoustic radiation force impulse Elasticity imaging techniques Liver Reference standards Virtual touch imaging and quantification Virtual touch tissue quantification Ultrasonography
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J,Calliada F, Cantisani V, Correas JM, D’Onofrio M, DrakonakiEE, Fink M, Friedrich-Rust M, Gilja OH, Havre RF, Jenssen C,Klauser AS, Ohlinger R, Saftoiu A, Schaefer F, Sporea I, PiscagliaF. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical useof ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology.Ultraschall Med 2013; 34: 169-184 [PMID: 23558397 DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1335205].
  • 2Colombo S, Buonocore M, Del Poggio A, Jamoletti C, Elia S,Mattiello M, Zabbialini D, Del Poggio P. Head-to-head comparisonof transient elastography (TE), real-time tissue elastography(RTE), and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging inthe diagnosis of liver fibrosis. J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 461-469[PMID: 22223175 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-011-0509-4].
  • 3Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, Sotoudeh F, RichterS, Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Poynard T, Dietrich CF, Vermehren J,Zeuzem S, Sarrazin C. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasiveassessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versustransient elastography. Radiology 2009; 252: 595-604 [PMID:19703889 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2523081928].
  • 4Takaki S, Kawakami Y, Miyaki D, Nakahara T, Naeshiro N,Murakami E, Tanaka M, Honda Y, Yokoyama S, Nagaoki Y,Kawaoka T, Hiramatsu A, Tsuge M, Hiraga N, Imamura M, HyogoH, Aikata H, Takahashi S, Arihiro K, Chayama K. Non-invasiveliver fibrosis score calculated by combination of virtual touch tissuequantification and serum liver functional tests in chronic hepatitisC patients. Hepatol Res 2014; 44: 280-287 [PMID: 23607728 DOI:10.1111/hepr.12129].
  • 5Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, Sporea I, Fierbinteanu-Braticevici C, Strobel D, Takahashi H, Yoneda M, Suda T, ZeuzemS, Herrmann E. Performance of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulseimaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis. JViral Hepat 2012; 19: e212-e219 [PMID: 22239521 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01537.x].
  • 6Bota S, Sporea I, Sirli R, Popescu A, Danila M, Costachescu D.Intra- and interoperator reproducibility of acoustic radiation forceimpulse (ARFI) elastography--preliminary results. UltrasoundMed Biol 2012; 38: 1103-1108 [PMID: 22579536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.02.032].
  • 7D'Onofrio M, Gallotti A, Mucelli RP. Tissue quantificationwith acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: Measurementrepeatability and normal values in the healthy liver. AJR Am JRoentgenol 2010; 195: 132-136 [PMID: 20566806 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3923].
  • 8Eiler J, Kleinholdermann U, Albers D, Dahms J, Hermann F,Behrens C, Luedemann M, Klingmueller V, Alzen GF. Standardvalue of ultrasound elastography using acoustic radiation forceimpulse imaging (ARFI) in healthy liver tissue of children andadolescents. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 474-479 [PMID: 23070933DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1313145].
  • 9Hanquinet S, Courvoisier D, Kanavaki A, Dhouib A, AnooshiravaniM. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging-normal valuesof liver stiffness in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol 2013; 43:539-544 [PMID: 23247632 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-012-2595-8].
  • 10Lee MJ, Kim MJ, Han KH, Yoon CS. Age-related changes in liver,kidney, and spleen stiffness in healthy children measured withacoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:e290-e294 [PMID: 23433651 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.01.018].

同被引文献14

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部