期刊文献+

Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair:A meta-analysis 被引量:34

Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair:A meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords:stoma repair,laparoscopic,parastomal,and hernia.Case reports,studies with less than 5 patients,and articles not written in English were excluded.Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study.If there was any discrepancy between scores,the study in question was referred to another author.A meta-analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models.Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test.The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia.Secondary outcomes were mesh infection,surgical site infection,obstruction requiring reoperation,death,and other complications.Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated.Except for recurrence,most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach.RESULTS:Fifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review.Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort,and not by approach.The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8%(95%CI:0.8-3.2),and there was no difference between techniques.The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection,which was seen in 3.8%(95%CI:2.3-5.7).Infected mesh was observed in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.1),and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.0).Other complications such as ileus,pneumonia,or urinary tract infection were noted in16.6%(95%CI:11.9-22.1).Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4%(95%CI:9.5-26.9).The recurrence rate was 10.2%(95%CI:3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach,whereas the recurrence rate was27.9%(95%CI:12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach.There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia.A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes. AIM:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the laparoscopic approaches for parastomal hernia repair reported in the literature.METHODS:A systematic review of PubMed and MEDLINE databases was conducted using various combination of the following keywords:stoma repair,laparoscopic,parastomal,and hernia.Case reports,studies with less than 5 patients,and articles not written in English were excluded.Eligible studies were further scrutinized with the 2011 levels of evidence from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.Two authors reviewed and analyzed each study.If there was any discrepancy between scores,the study in question was referred to another author.A meta-analysis was performed using both random and fixed-effect models.Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's funnel plot and Egger's regression test.The primary outcome analyzed was recurrence of parastomal hernia.Secondary outcomes were mesh infection,surgical site infection,obstruction requiring reoperation,death,and other complications.Studies were grouped by operative technique where indicated.Except for recurrence,most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort and not by approach so they were analyzed across approach.RESULTS:Fifteen articles with a total of 469 patients were deemed eligible for review.Most postoperative morbidities were reported for the overall cohort,and not by approach.The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 1.8%(95%CI:0.8-3.2),and there was no difference between techniques.The most common postoperative complication was surgical site infection,which was seen in 3.8%(95%CI:2.3-5.7).Infected mesh was observed in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.1),and obstruction requiring reoperation also occurred in 1.7%(95%CI:0.7-3.0).Other complications such as ileus,pneumonia,or urinary tract infection were noted in16.6%(95%CI:11.9-22.1).Eighty-one recurrences were reported overall for a recurrence rate of 17.4%(95%CI:9.5-26.9).The recurrence rate was 10.2%(95%CI:3.9-19.0) for the modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker approach,whereas the recurrence rate was27.9%(95%CI:12.3-46.9) for the keyhole approach.There were no intraoperative mortalities reported and six mortalities during the postoperative course.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh repair is safe and effective for treating parastomal hernia.A modified Sugarbaker approach appears to provide the best outcomes.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第28期8670-8677,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 PARASTOMAL HERNIA LAPAROSCOPIC Repair Treatment Sugarbaker KEYHOLE Sandwich ILEOSTOMY COLOSTOMY Parastomal Hernia Laparoscopic Repair Treatment Sugarbaker Keyhole Sandwich Ileostomy Colostomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br JSurg 2003; 90: 784-793 [PMID: 12854101].
  • 2Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am 2008; 88:113-25, ix [PMID: 18267165 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.10.003].
  • 3Craft RO, Huguet KL, McLemore EC, Harold KL. Laparoscopicparastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2008; 12: 137-140 [PMID:17999128].
  • 4Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life tableanalysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis ColonRectum 1994; 37: 916-920 [PMID: 8076492].
  • 5López-Cano M, Lozoya-Trujillo R, Quiroga S, Sánchez JL,Vallribera F, Martí M, Jiménez LM, Armengol-Carrasco M, EspínE. Use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia duringlaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: a randomized controlledtrial. Hernia 2012; 16: 661-667 [PMID: 22782367 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-0952-z].
  • 6Ripoche J, Basurko C, Fabbro-Perray P, Prudhomme M.Parastomal hernia. A study of the French federation of ostomypatients. J Visc Surg 2011; 148: e435-e441 [PMID: 22130074 DOI:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.10.006].
  • 7Rosin JD, Bonardi RA. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlexmesh: a new technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1977; 20: 299-302[PMID: 862490].
  • 8Ogata S, Hongo M. Bacteriophages of the genus Clostridium. AdvAppl Microbiol 1979; 25: 241-273 [PMID: 397738].
  • 9LeBlanc KA, Bellanger DE, Whitaker JM, Hausmann MG.Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 2005; 9: 140-144[PMID: 15602627].
  • 10Hansson BM, de Hingh IH, Bleichrodt RP. Laparoscopicparastomal hernia repair is feasible and safe: early results of aprospective clinical study including 55 consecutive patients. SurgEndosc 2007; 21: 989-993 [PMID: 17353985].

同被引文献128

引证文献34

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部