1Shoemaker ,B.J.E. An evaluation study of the implementation of an integrated curriculum model in selected elementary' school in Eugene, Oregon. Dissertation Abstracts International, University of Oregon No.AAC9405227. 1993,54 (10):3673.
2Brodhagen B.L.. Teacher decision makinz within curriculum integration. Dissertation Abstracts International, The University of Wisconsin-Madison No. AAC1391215. 1998, 59 (5):1443.
3Tsai, C.C. A science teacher's reflections and knowledge growth about STS instruction after actual implementation[J]. Science education, 2001,86(1): 23-41.
4Weilbacher,G.A. Why teachers decide to use, then not use, curriculum integrationg as their curriculum planning philosophy. Doctoral dissertation,The University of Wisconsin, 2000.
5Aikenhead, G.S. Teacher decision making: The case ot prairie high[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 1984, 21(2): 167-186.
6Courson, S.K, Zembal-saul, Carla M. Stories of teaching biotechnology: A case study of volitional curriculum implementation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching[C]. New Orleans, LA, 2002, April.
7Crawley, F.E., & Sayler, B.A. Origins of life science teachers' beliefs underlying curriculum reform in Texas [J]. Science Education, 1995, 79(6): 611-635.
8Drake, S, & Miller, J.P. Teachers' perceptions of their roles: Life in and beyond the classroom[J]. Curriculum and Teaching, 2001,16(1).
9Akey, J.M; Gilbert, J. The Essentials Approach: An Integrated Curriculum Model for Rethinking the Curriculum ot the Future. ED339519, 1990.
10MitYEer, C.P, & Ronald, D.A. Teachers' perspective: Developing and implementing an STS curriculum[J]. Journal of research in science teaching, 1989,26(4): 351-369.
