期刊文献+

cNCCN指南对Her-2过表达型乳腺癌治疗的指导意义 被引量:1

The Guiding Significance of c NCCN Guidelines for the Treatment of Her-2 Over-Expressing Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]总结在c NCCN指导下的Her-2过表达型乳腺癌的临床特征、诊疗现状及相应预后;判定c NCCN指南对于Her-2过表达型乳腺癌临床治疗的指导价值。[方法]回顾性分析具有明确病理学诊断的530例Her-2过表达型乳腺癌患者资料,并进行预后因素分析。[结果]根据2007~2011各年c NCCN乳腺癌临床实践指南,紫杉类药物规范治疗组较非规范治疗组的OS延长(49.379个月vs 2.087个月,P=0.024);而蒽环类规范治疗组与非规范治疗组的PFS及OS无统计学差异。对于AJCC分期Ⅲ期Her-2过表达型乳腺癌患者,紫杉规范治疗组较蒽环规范治疗组PFS明显延长(49.875个月vs 31.594个月,P=0.036),而两组之间的OS无统计学差异(P=0.369);AJCCⅠ期,Ⅱ期,Ⅳ期及淋巴结阴性的紫杉规范治疗组与蒽环规范治疗组的PFS及OS无统计学差异(P〈0.05)。规范放疗组较非规范放疗组延长了OS(54.360个月vs45.927个月,P=0.044);赫塞汀规范治疗组较非规范治疗组的延长了PFS(66.758个月vs52.863个月,P=0.027),但OS无统计学意义(P=0.059)。[结论 ]对于Her-2过表达型乳腺癌,规范的紫杉醇类化疗方案、规范放疗可延长患者的总生存,而赫塞汀规范应用可改善其无病生存期。 [Purpose] To summarized the clinical characteristics,treatment status and prognosis for breast cancer with Her-2 over-expression underling the c NCCN Guideline,and to determine the value of c NCCN Guideline on the therapy of breast cancer with Her-2 over-expression. [Methods]The clinical date of 530 cases with breast cancer with Her-2 over-expression pathologically proven were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic factors of breast cancer with Her-2 over-expression were analyzed. [Results] According to the c NCCN breast cancer clinical practice guidelines of 2007~2011,patients who received standard taxane-based therapy had significantly longer OS compared with nonstandard taxane-based therapy group(49.379 months vs 2.087 months,P=0.024. The PFS and OS of patients with standard anthracycline-based therapy were not prolonged than those who had nonstandard anthracycline-based therapy. In AJCC stage Ⅲ patients,the PFS of standard taxane-based therapy group was significantly longer than standard anthracycline-based therapy group(49.875 months vs 31.594 months,P=0.036),but OS was no difference(P=0.369). And in AJCC stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅳ and lymph node negative patients,there were no differences of PFS and OS between the two groups(P=0.059). The standard radiotherapy was improved survival compared with non-standard radiotherapy(54.360 months vs 45.927 months,P=0.044). Standard herceptin-based therapy group had significantly longer PFS compared with non-standard herceptin-based therapy group(66.758 months vs 52.863 months,P=0.027),but OS was no difference(P=0.059). [Conclusion] For breast cancer patients with Her-2 over expressing,the standard taxane-based therapy and radiotherapy improve OS,and the PFS is improved in the standard herceptin-based therapy.
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2015年第8期688-695,共8页 China Cancer
关键词 Her-2过表达型乳腺癌 临床特点 c NCCN 预后 赫塞汀 Her-2 over-expressing breast cancer clinical characteristics c NCCN prognosis Herceptin
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1黄哲宙,陈万青,吴春晓,郑荣寿,陈建国,杨念念,王宁,张思维,郑莹.中国女性乳腺癌的发病和死亡现况——全国32个肿瘤登记点2003—2007年资料分析报告[J].肿瘤,2012,32(6):435-439. 被引量:369
  • 2Chariyalertsak S,Purisa W,Vinyuvat S. Her-2/neu ampli- fication determined by real-time quantitative PCR and its association with clinical outcome of breast cancer in Thai- land[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2011,12(7) : 1703-1706.
  • 3Carey LA,Dees EC,Sawyer L,et al. The triple negative paradox :primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007,13(8) : 2329-2334.
  • 4Hayes DF,Thor AD,Dressler LG,et al. Her2 and re- sponse to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007,357(15) : 1496-1506.
  • 5Kimura M,Sano M,Fujimori M,et al. Neoadjuvant pacli- taxel for operable breast cancer:muhicenter phase II trial with clinical outcomes [J]. Anticancer Res,2008,28(2B):1239-1244.
  • 6Heys SD,Sarkar T,Hutcheon AW. Docetaxel as adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment for patients with breast cancer [J]. Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2004,5(10) : 2147-2157.
  • 7Ellis P,Barrett-Lee P,Johnson L. Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (TACT):an open-label,phase m , randomized controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2009,373 (9676) : 1681-1692.
  • 8Overgaard M ,Hansen PS, Overgaard J ,et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial[J]. N Engl J Med, 1997,337(14) : 949-955.
  • 9Overgaard M,Jensen MB,Overgaard J,et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen:Danisb Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial [J]. Lancet, 1999,353(9165) : 1641-1648.
  • 10Ragaz J, Olivotto IA,Spinelli JJ,et al. Loeoregional radia- tion therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer re- ceiving adjuvant chemotherapy:20-year results of the British Columbia randomized trial [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005,97(2) : 116-126.

二级参考文献22

  • 1杨玲,李连弟,陈育德,D.M.Parkin.中国乳腺癌发病死亡趋势的估计与预测[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(6):438-440. 被引量:278
  • 2Rakha EA, El-Rehim DA, Paish C, et al. Basal phenotype identifies a poor prognostic subgroup of breast cancer of clinical importance[]]. Eur J Cancer, 2006, 42(18): 3149-3156.
  • 3Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13(8): 2329-2334.
  • 4Carey LA, Metzger R, Dees EG, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasls stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast cancer outcome[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2005 97(15): 1137-1142.
  • 5Ghollet P, Amat S, Belembaogo E, et al. Is Nottingham prognostic index useful after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer[J]? BrJ Gancer, 2003, 89(7): 1185-1191.
  • 6Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR, et al. Prognostic markers in triple-negative breast cancer[J]. Cancer, 2007, 109(1):25-32.
  • 7Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast cancer[J]. Br J Surg, 2007, 94 (10): 1189-1200.
  • 8Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11(16): 5678-5685.
  • 9Umemura S, Takekoshi S, Suzuki Y, et al. Estrogen receptor-negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer tissue have the highest Ki-67 labeling index and EGFR expression: gene amplification does not contribute to EGFR expression[J]. Oncol Rep, 2005, 14(2): 337-343.
  • 10Bhatavdekar JM, Patel DD, Shah NG, et al. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemically localized biomarkers in stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ breast cancer:a multivariate analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2000, 7(4): 305-311.

共引文献381

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部