期刊文献+

生产率与中国企业国际化模式:来自微观企业的证据 被引量:10

Productivity and Chinese Enterprises' Internationalization Mode:Evidence from Micro–level Enterprises
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从微观角度研究中国企业生产率及国际化模式选择是否符合新新贸易理论。在匹配《境外投资企业(机构)名录》与工业企业数据库的基础上,借助一阶随机占优的Kolmogorov-Smirnov非参数检验,发现对外投资企业、出口企业和非出口企业间的生产率关系并不完全符合新新贸易理论,出口企业存在"生产率悖论"。随后,本文基于多元Logit回归模型分析企业生产率对国际化模式选择的影响,全样本回归结果显示,企业生产率有效地促进了企业对外投资,但不利于企业出口,并进一步从出口密度视角为出口企业的"生产率悖论"问题进行解释及验证。 This paper studies whether firms' productivity and internationaliza- tion mode choices in China comply with the new trade theory. Using the matched data of the catalog of foreign investment enterprises and industrial enter- prises, and through first- order random dominant Kolmogorov- Smirnov nonpara- metric test, this paper finds that productivities of foreign investment enterprises, export enterprises and non- export enterprises are not completely in line with the new trade theory. There is a “productivity paradox” for export enterprises. Then, based on the multivariate logit regression model, the paper studies the im- pact of productivity on enterprise internationalization mode and finds that produc- tivity is an important promoting factor for enterprises to invest abroad, but it is not conducive to export enterprises. Further, this paper explains and verifies the “productivity paradox”of export enterprises from the perspective of export density.
出处 《国际贸易问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第8期24-32,共9页 Journal of International Trade
基金 国家自然基金项目"中国企业海外并购与产业国际竞争力研究"(71273142)
关键词 企业生产率 国际化模式 出口 对外投资 TFP Export Outward foreign investment Internationalizationmode
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献56

  • 1黄先海,石东楠.对外贸易对我国全要素生产率影响的测度与分析[J].世界经济研究,2005(1):22-26. 被引量:67
  • 2彭国华.双边国际贸易引力模型中地区生产率的经验研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(8):123-132. 被引量:64
  • 3Aw, B.Y. ; Chung, Sukkyun and Roberts, M.J. "Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea. " The World Bank Economic Review, 1999, 2.
  • 4Bernard, A.B. and Jensen, J.B. "Exporters, Jobs and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing, 1976-1987. " Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics , Vol. 1995, 1995, pp. 67-119.
  • 5Bernard, A.B. and Jensen, J.B. "Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?" Journal of International Economics, 1999 (47), pp. 1-26.
  • 6Bernard, A.B. and Jensen, J.B. "Entry, Expansion, and Intensity in the US Export Boom, 1987-1992. "Review of International Economics, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2004, pp. 662-675.
  • 7Bernard, A.B. ; Jensen, J.B. ; Redding, S.J. and Sehott, P.K. "Firms in International Trade. " Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 21, No.3, 2007, pp. 105-130.
  • 8Bernard, A.B. and Wagner, J. "Export Entry and Exit By German Firms." NBER Working Paper 6538, 1998/4.
  • 9Bernard, A.B., Redding, S.J. and Schott, P.K. "Multi-Product Finns and Trade Liberalization. " Tuck School of Business Working Paper No. 2008-44, 2006/12/1.
  • 10Clerides, S.K. ;Lach, S. and Tybout, J.R. "Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. " The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, No. 3, 1998. pp. 903- 947.

同被引文献172

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部