摘要
卞东波《宋代诗歌总集新考》一文在考证内容上有值得商榷的地方,具体而言,卞氏所考《唐宋类诗》、《郴江前集》《后集》《续集》为重复辑考,祝尚书《宋人总集叙录》已考证,并非新考;《润州类集》、《滁州集》著录名称不妥,应为《丹阳类稿》、《滁阳庆历集》,且后者为《宋人总集叙录》已考,亦非新考;《蕙亩拾英集》的性质是诗话,而非诗歌总集。
Bian Dongbo' s "New Examination of the Collection of the Song Dynasty' s Poems is worth critiquing in contents. Specifically, his examination of "Poems of the Tang and Song Dynasties" and "Book 1, Book 2 and Continued Part of Chenjiang" is not new but a duplicated effort over previous work. Besides, there are similar problems elsewhere and even a problem of identifying literary genres.
出处
《贵州民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2015年第3期83-86,共4页
Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science
基金
国家社科基金项目"理学思想与选本批评:宋明理学家选本编纂研究"[编号:14XZW040]
关键词
《宋代诗歌总集新考》
考证
商榷
New Examination of the Collection of the Song Dynasty' s Poems
examination
critique