摘要
有关寺庙道观房屋产权归属的创制性司法解释建构并区分了作为公共财产和私有财产的寺庙道观房屋。该司法解释对二者的区分,表面上是将出资(资本)标准作为判断标准,实际上蕴含了另一种不易察觉的却是真实的判断标准,即用途标准。同时,该司法解释还确认了寺庙道观房屋权利结构的二元性,即宗教团体对寺庙、道观房屋的所有权和僧、尼、道士对寺庙、道观房屋的使用权。后者可以分为性质和内容迥异的两种使用权类型,而且都是我国物权立法所不熟悉的,只在有限且特定的范围内存在。
In the creative judicial interpretation about property right' s adscription of temple buildings,it constructs and differentiates two kinds of temple buildings——one is treated as public property and another one is treated as private property.In the judicial interpretation,seemingly it uses capital contribution(capital) standard as the judgment standard on how to differentiating that two kinds of temple buildings,but virtually it contains a real judgment standard——use standard which can' t be perceived easily.Meanwhile,the judicial interpretation also confirms the duality of temple buildings ' right structure,namely the temple building' s ownership of religion group and the temple building' s usufruct of monk、nun and Taoist.The latter can be divided into two widely different usufruct types which are both unfamiliar in our country' s real right legislation,and they only exist in limited and specific range.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第8期68-76,共9页
Law Science Magazine
关键词
特殊类型的公共财产
出资标准
用途标准
利益相关者保护
public property of special type
capital contribution standard
use standard
protection of stakeholders