摘要
刑事审前阶段中非法证据排除程序的合理程序架构对于保障犯罪嫌疑人合法权利具有十分重要的理论与实践意义。文章从实践、规范、理论三个维度解构当前审前阶段非法证据排除程序的主体混乱、程序空白、效力不足等问题,并在此基础上提出与比较了侦查机关内部排除和检察机关外部排除的异同,明确侦查阶段与审查起诉阶段非法证据排除的不同主体和与之相适应的书面审查和听证程序的不同构造,以及完善整合审前阶段非法取证实体性制裁和程序性制裁体系的可能进路。
A reasonable institutional framework for the Exclusionary Rule in the pretrial stage of criminal procedure has both theoretical and practical meanings on protecting the legitimate rights of criminal suspects.There are still many problems remained in the current procedure for China' s exclusionary rule in investigation and prosecution proceedings from the perspective of judicial practice.It is necessary to deconstruct the current procedure of the exclusionary rule by practice,norm and theory dimensions,as well as to compare the different procedure forms of the investigation and prosecution departments,on the basis of which the possible approach to properly build the procedures for China' s exclusionary rule in pretrial proceedings.
出处
《法学杂志》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第8期132-140,共9页
Law Science Magazine
基金
中国法学会2014年度部级法学研究重点课题"完善人权司法保障制度研究"[课题编号:CLS(2014)B07]的阶段性成果
关键词
审前程序
非法证据排除
科学构建
pretrial proceedings
the exclusionary rule
perfection