期刊文献+

凸显视域下英语名词性隐喻结构的不可逆性研究 被引量:2

On the Irreversibility of English Nominal Metaphorical Constructions from the Perspective of Prominence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文评述了七种隐喻理论在阐释英语名词性隐喻结构不可逆性方面的利弊,并提出凸显整合模型,认为本体凸显导致隐喻的层创意义具有本体指向性,因而本体的变换会导致层创结构的变更,继而会致使隐喻产生不同的交际意义和功能,因此英语名词性隐喻具有不可逆性。在凸显整合模型中,语境、认知模型和文化模型是影响英语隐喻不可逆性的重要因素。 This article comments on pros and cons of seven kinds of metaphorical theories on the elucidation of irreversibility of English nominal metaphorical constructions, and puts up with Prominent Blending Model, which considers that a prominent topic makes the metaphorical emergent meaning become topic-orientated, and the change of a topic would contribute to the alteration of the emergent structure, which would subsequently result in different communicative meaning and function of the metaphor, by which a conclusion could be drawn that English nominal metaphors are irreversible. In a Prominent Blending Model, context, cognitive models and cultural models are important elements of affecting English metaphorical irreversibility.
作者 彭卓
机构地区 韶关学院
出处 《语言教育》 2015年第3期33-39,共7页 Language Education
基金 2014年广东省大学英语教学改革计划项目(项目编号:2014GDB02) 2014年度韶关市哲学社会科学规划课题(项目编号:G2014008) 2013年度韶关学院第十四批教育教学改革研究一般项目(项目编号:syjy20131435) 2013年度韶关学院校级科研项目(项目编号:[2013]205)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 隐喻 凸显整合模型 不可逆性 顺应选择 交际功能 metaphor Prominent Blending Model irreversibility accommodating selection communicative functions
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1王勤学.《思维空间》述介[J].外语教学与研究,1994,26(1):68-72. 被引量:105
  • 2向明友.论言语配置的新经济原则[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):9-16. 被引量:128
  • 3束定芳.论隐喻的运作机制[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(2):98-106. 被引量:389
  • 4Cameron, L. , R. Maslen. Metaphor Analysis . Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities [M]. London; Equinox, 2010.
  • 5Casasanto, D. When Is a Linguistic Metaphor a Conceptual Metaphor? [M]// Evans, V. , S. Pourcel. New Direc- tions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam. John Benjamins Pub Co. , 2009.
  • 6Colburn, T. , G. Shute. Metaphor in Computer Science [J]. Journal of Applied Logic, 2008, 6(4). 526 -533.
  • 7Coulson, S. Semantic Leaps. Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction [M]. Cam bridge. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 8Fauconnier, G. Methods and Generalizations [M]// Janssen, T. , G. Redeker. Cognitive Linguistics. Founda- tions, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
  • 9Gibbs, R. Researching Metaphor [M]// Cameron, L. , G. Low. Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cam bridge. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  • 10Glueksberg, S., B. Keysar. Understanding Metaphoric Comparisons. Beyond Similarity [J]. Psychological Re- view, 97.1(1990). 3-18.

共引文献7

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部