期刊文献+

满意度视域下高职院校学生学习质量实证研究 被引量:8

Empirical Research on Learning Quality in Higher Vocational and Technical Colleges from the View of Students' Satisfaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 依托"国家大学生学习情况调查"平台,通过对18980名学生的满意度调查,探求高职院校学生学习过程所涉及的各要素对学习质量的解释力和影响力。调查表明:高职院校在校学生对于学习收获整体持肯定态度,教师教学是最具解释力的因子,人际关系成为高职学生学习收获认知新的增长点,而高职院校对学生学习提供的校园支持并没有达到理想状态。据此结果,建议高职院校进一步提高教师教学水平、注重引导学生建立良好的人际关系以及提高学生对学习资源获取的主动性。 Based on the data NCSS, the students' satisfaction survey involving 18980 students in China explores the effects of elements involved in the learning process on the quality of the study in higher vocational and technical colleges. The result has shown that, although students' learning satisfaction is positive , the influence factors on learing quality are still different.So some suggestions have been brought out: having a further improvement on the teaching level, emphasizing on guiding students to establish good interpersonal relationship and paying more attention to students' lack of initiative of learning resources..
作者 薛栋 文静
出处 《职业技术教育》 北大核心 2015年第13期44-48,共5页 Vocational and Technical Education
基金 国家社会科学基金(教育学科)国家重点课题"大学生学习情况调查研究"(AIA100007) 主持人:史秋衡
关键词 高等职业教育 学习质量 满意度 higher vocational education learning quality satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1黄繁华.论开放条件下南京服务业的发展[J].南京社会科学,1998(11):63-67. 被引量:3
  • 2(美)詹姆斯.服务管理-运营、战略和信息技术(第二版)[M].机械工业出版社,2000..
  • 3[美]德里克·博克.回归大学之道:对美国大学本科教育的反思与展望[M].侯定凯,等译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2008:197.198.5.5.187.
  • 4联合国教科文组织.学会生存--教育世界的今天与明天[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1979:38.
  • 5龚放,张红霞,余秀兰,曲铭峰.教授上讲台:提高高等教育质量的必由之路[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009.
  • 6Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
  • 7Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
  • 8Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
  • 9Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
  • 10Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).

共引文献727

同被引文献75

引证文献8

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部