期刊文献+

e-BRM:面向电子易货的多维信誉模型 被引量:1

e-BRM: A Multi-dimensionality Reputation Model for e-Barter
原文传递
导出
摘要 【目的】针对电子易货(e-Barter)这一新兴C2C在线交易模式,提出优于其现有(1,0,–1)评分制的多维信誉模型e-BRM。【方法】e-BRM基于Wilson评分区间计算易货者好评率,基于等概率分布计算易货者好评覆盖率,并通过时效衰减因子、差评惩罚因子、实名认证因子等指标实现对易货者交易值的聚合处理。【结果】e-BRM最终将得到的三元组<好评率,覆盖率,交易值>聚合为统一的易货者信誉度,较(1,0,–1)评分制更能表征易货者真实信誉水平。【局限】在实际应用e-BRM时,可单独设计模型的在线增量更新机制以改善实时性。【结论】仿真实验结果能够证明e-BRM模型的有效性,电子易货交易双方可据此做出合理交易决策以降低交易风险。 [Objective] A multi-dimensionality reputation model, named e-BRM, is proposed to surpass (1, 0,-1) scoring system used in e-Barter (one type of emerging online C2C market). [Methods] Based on Wilson score interval and uniform distribution, e-BRM can calculate positive ratio and positive coverage ratio respectively. Meanwhile, time-delay factor, negative punishing factor and real name authentication factor are designed in e-BRM to be further aggregated as barter's transaction value. [Results] The positive ratio, coverage ratio and transaction value are aggregated as barter's reputation degree by e-BRM. The aggregated value can describe barter's true reputation degree better than that of (1, 0,-1) scoring system. [Limitations] For the application of e-BRM, an online updating mechanism should be designed for improving real-time performance. [Conclusions] Simulation experimental results show the validity of e-BRM, thus barters can make reasonable deal decisions based on reputation degree for decreasing transaction risk.
作者 李聪 马丽
出处 《现代图书情报技术》 CSSCI 2015年第7期122-130,共9页 New Technology of Library and Information Service
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"面向电子商务协同推荐的新型用户兴趣模型研究"(项目编号:71202165) 四川省哲学社会科学规划项目"基于多维指标的电子商务信誉评价机制研究"(项目编号:SC13C019)的研究成果之一
关键词 电子易货 Wilson评分区间 信誉C2C e-BRM模型 e-Barter;Wilson score interval;Reputation;Consumer-to-Consumer;e-BRM model
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1吴剑云,张嵩.电子易货资源匹配模型研究[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(1):56-60. 被引量:2
  • 2Akerlof G A. The Market for "Lemon": Qualitative Uncertainly and the Market Mechanism [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, 84(3): 488-500.
  • 3中华人民共和国工业和信息化部.电子商务“十二五”发展规划[R].北京:工业和信息化部,2012.
  • 4Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Friedman E, et al. Reputation Systems: Facilitating Trust in Internet Interactions [J]. Communications of the ACM, 2000, 43(12): 45-48.
  • 5Fan M, Tan Y, Whinston A B. Evaluation and Design of Online Cooperative Feedback Mechanisms for Reputation Management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2005, 17(2): 244-254.
  • 6Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, et al. The Value of Reputation on eBay: A Controlled Experiment [J]. Experimental Economics, 2006, 9(2): 79-101.
  • 7Bolton G E, Katok E, Ockenfels A. How Effective are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms? An Experimental Investigation [J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(11): 1587-1602.
  • 8Fouss F, Achbany ~, Saerens M. A Probabilistic Reputation Model Based on Transaction Ratings [J]. Information Sciences, 2010, 180(11): 2095-2123.
  • 9Wu F, Li H, Kuo Y. Reputation Evaluation for Choosing a Trustworthy Counterparty in C2C E-commerce [J]. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2011, 10(4): 428-436.
  • 10纪淑娴,胡培,程飞.在线信誉管理系统中信用度计算模型研究[J].预测,2008,27(4):59-65. 被引量:16

二级参考文献88

共引文献32

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部