摘要
《黄帝内经》和《希波克拉底文集》均唯物地、辩证地认识疾病和生命现象,是中西医学的奠基性著作,因此两种医学理论体系在建立之初都表现出顺从自然以恢复人体自组织平衡的相同点。然而,两种医学体系在研究方法上最终以西方医学逻辑体系的建立和实验方法的确立分道扬镳,从而导致中西医学发展成为两种截然不同的医学体系,形成各具特色的"贯通—传承"模式和"证否—更替"模式。
The two books of Huangdi Neijing and Hippocratic Corpusare all materialistic and dialectical expound diseases and biological phenomena. They are foundations for TCM and western medicine, so the two medical theories expressed obey nature for recover the ban- lance of body at the first. But,on the methods of study,the western medicine finally part company each going his own way with TCM by western medicine logic system and experimental methods, which lead to Chinese and western medicine developed into distinct medical systyms, formed respectively characteristics with penetration-inheritance mode and evidence no-substltute mode.
出处
《中医学报》
CAS
2015年第8期1148-1150,共3页
Acta Chinese Medicine
基金
国家中医药管理局十二五中医药重点学科{国中医药人教发[2012]32号}
河南中医学院汉语国际中医药文化推广及特色专业建设项目(2012HTJC302)
