期刊文献+

碳信息披露要素与企业绩效关系研究 被引量:15

Relationship Between Factors of Carbon Disclosure and Corporate Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本论文以标普500强企业(S&P500)为研究样本,以碳信息披露项目(CDP)2010问卷为数据来源,通过因子分析法把碳信息披露分为碳风险碳机遇披露、碳战略披露和碳核算披露三个披露要素,运用结构化方程实证检验了碳信息披露三个要素之间的内部相关性及其分别与企业绩效的相关性。研究发现碳信息披露质量总体会促进企业绩效的提高,而且碳信息披露各个要素之间也存在相互促进的关系。论文不仅关注了碳信息披露质量对企业绩效的影响,提出了企业节能减排的重要意义,还分析了碳信息不同披露要素之间的相互促进关系,这对于企业如何提高碳信息披露质量具有较好的借鉴作用。 Based on a sample of S&P 500 companies and Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) 2010 questionnaire as source of carbon disclosure score, this study used factor analysis method to divide carbon disclosure into three factor, carbon risk and opportunity, carbon strategy, and carbon accounting. The paper tests relationships between factors of carbon disclosure and corporate performance by Structure Equation model. The results show that there are significant positive relationships between carbon risk and opportunity and corporate performance, carbon accounting and corporate performance. And there are mutual influences among in factors of carbon disclosure. The significant positive relationship between carbon disclosure and corporate performance mean the importance for company about carbon reduction. The analysis of mutual influences among in factors of carbon disclosure will give good suggestion for better carbon disclosure of company.
作者 蒋琰 周雯雯
出处 《南京财经大学学报》 2015年第4期68-78,共11页 Journal of Nanjing University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"碳披露 碳绩效与市场反应:基于中国情景的研究"(71272237) 国家社科基金项目(13BGL057)的阶段性成果 江苏省第四期"333高层次培养人才工程" 江苏省"青蓝工程"中青年学术带头人 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队建设资助
关键词 碳信息披露要素 碳信息披露项目 企业绩效 factors of carbon disclosure carbon disclosure project corporate performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Kolk M, D Levy, J Pinkse. Corporate Responses in an Emerging Climate Regime: The Institutionalization and Commensuration of Carbon Disclosure [ J ]. European Accounting Review, 2008,17 (4) : 719 - 745.
  • 2Li Y, Richardson G D, Thornton D B. Corporate Dis-closure of Environmental Liability Information: Theory and Evidence [ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 1997,14(3) :435 -474.
  • 3Suchman M C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and In- stitutional Approaches [ J ]. The Academy of Manage- ment Review, 1995,20 ( 3 ) :571 - 610.
  • 4Milne M J, Patten D M. Securing Organizational Legiti- macy: An Experimental Decision Case Examining the Impact of Environmental Disclosures [ J ]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2002, 15 ( 3 ) : 372 - 405.
  • 5O' Donovan G. Environmental Disclosures in the Annual Report: Extending the Applicability and Predictive Pow- er of Legitimacy Theory [ J ]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2002,15 (3) : 344 - 371.
  • 6O' Dwyer B. Managerial Perceptions of Corporate Social Disclosure : An Irish Story[ J]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,2002,15 (3) :406 - 436.
  • 7Bebbington J, Larrinaga-Gonz61ez C. Carbon Trading: Accounting and Reporting Issues [ J ]. European Ac- counting Review, 2008,17 (4) :697 - 717.
  • 8Laine M. Ensuring Legitimacy Through Rhetorical Changes? : A Longitudinal Interpretation of the Environ- mental Disclosures of A Leading Finnish Chemical Com- pany [ J ]. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Jour- nal,2009,22 ( 7 ) : 1029 - 1054.
  • 9Donaldson T, Preston L E. The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation : Concepts, Evidence, and Implications [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1995,20 (1) :65 -91.
  • 10Mitchell R K, Agle B R, Wood D J. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience : Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts[J]. The A- cademy of Management Review, 1997,22 ( 4 ) : 853 - 886.

同被引文献122

引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部