期刊文献+

孕晚期吗啡暴露对子代鼠吗啡成瘾易感性的影响 被引量:2

Late gestational morphine exposure increasing addiction vulnerability in offspring rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检测孕晚期吗啡暴露对子代鼠吗啡成瘾易感性的影响。方法:孕晚期SD大鼠48只随机分为吗啡组( M组)和生理盐水组( N组)。 M组孕鼠在孕12~18 d每天9∶00和17∶00两次皮下注射吗啡,首剂量为2 mg/kg,逐日递增1 mg/kg,至6 mg/kg维持。 N组孕鼠以同样的方式注射等体积的生理盐水。取上述2组体质量接近的子代鼠50只正常喂养至8周龄。每组子代鼠先采用恒量法(吗啡剂量3 mg/kg)连续颈背部皮下注射吗啡7 d进行条件位置偏爱(CPP )训练,训练结束24 h后对CPP效应进行检测;之后继续采用递增法(吗啡首剂量4 mg/kg,逐日递增1 mg/kg)以同样方式注射吗啡连续训练7 d至10 mg/kg,训练结束24 h后对子代鼠再次进行CPP效应的检测。结果:①预测试时,两组的CPP基数值[分别为(99.2±22.96) s和(86.1±20.27)s]差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经过7 d的吗啡恒量训练后,M组子代鼠CPP测试值(284.6±58.93)s相对于基线值(99.2±22.96)s明显增高(P<0.01),而N组子代鼠CPP测试值(116.6±36.95)s与基线值(86.1±20.27)s相比无明显差异(P>0.05);继续经过7 d的吗啡递增量训练后,M组和N组子代鼠CPP测试值[分别为(432.3±74.21) s,(221.0±58.26)s]与CPP基线值[分别为(99.2±22.96)s,(86.1±20.27)s]相比均出现差异(P<0.01,P<0.01),M组子代鼠CPP测试值(432.3±74.21)s与N组(221.0±58.26)s相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且M组子代鼠CPP分值(331.4±69.47)s明显高于N组子代鼠CPP分值(124.8±58.68)s(P<0.05)。结论:孕晚期吗啡暴露可增加子代鼠对吗啡的成瘾易感性。 Obej ctive: To observe the impact of late pregnancy morphine exposure to addiction vulnerability in offspring of rats .Methods:Forty-eight late pregnant SD rats were randomized divided into morphine group ( M group) and saline group ( N Group) .Pregnant rats in M group were subcutaneously in-jected with morphine at 9:00 AM and 8:00 PM twice daily during 12 to 18 days of pregnancy.Initial dose was 2 mg/kg,and increased at 1 mg/kg day by day till final 6 mg/kg.Pregnant rats in N group were administered with the same volume of saline as the same protocol.Fifty offspring rats with similar body weight were selected from the two groups,and routinely fed for 8 weeks.Constant dose of morphine(3 mg/kg) was subcutaneously administered at the back of neck for 7 days to start conditioned place preference(CPP) paradigm,and the CPP effects were examined after 24 h of condition.Then magnitude dose of morphine( initial dose at 4 mg/kg by additional 1 mg/kg day by day ) was applied in the same protocol for7 days till final dose of 10 mg/kg,and the CPP effects were further determined after 24 h of conditioning.Results:CPP cardinality value was (99.2 ±22.96)s and (86.1 ±20.27)s for the two groups ,and the difference was not significant(P〉0.05).After 7 day of constant morphine sensitizing,CPP values were significantly increased in the off-spring rats in group M as compared with baseline values [(284.6 ±58.93)s vs.( 99.2 ±22.96)s](P〈0.01),whereas CPP values remained no signifi-cant difference in group N[(116.6 ±36.95)s vs.(861.±20 .27) s](P〉0.05).After magnitude dose conditioning with morphine for 7 days,CPP val-ues tested in the group M and group N were different from the baseline values[(432.3 ±74.21)s and (221.0 ±58.26)s vs.(99.2 ±22.96)s and (86. 1 ±20.27)s](P〈0.01;P〈0.05),and group M had significantly higher CPP test values than group N[(432.3 ±74.21)s vs.(221.0 ±58.26)s](P 〈0.05).CPP score of group M was significantly higher than group N[(331.4 ±69.47)s vs.(124.8 ±58.68)s](P〈0.05).Conclusion:Late gesta-tional morphine exposure may increase the vulnerability of offspring rats to addiction to morphine .
出处 《皖南医学院学报》 CAS 2015年第4期310-313,共4页 Journal of Wannan Medical College
基金 安徽省高校省级自然科学基金项目(JK2013Z337) 皖南医学院重点科研培育基金项目(WK2012ZF05) 皖南医学院中青年科研基金项目(WK200922F)
关键词 孕晚期 吗啡暴露 子代鼠 条件位置偏爱 成瘾易感性 late pregnancy morphine exposure offspring rats conditioned place preference vulnerability to addiction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1胡谋先,谢虹,樊友珍,孙材陇,王阿敬.大鼠隔-海马通路横切对记忆功能及海马内去甲肾上腺素含量的影响[J].同济医科大学学报,1994,23(2):84-86. 被引量:2
  • 2Schaffer DV,Gage FH. Neurogenesis and neuroadaptation [J]. Neuromo- lecular Med ,2004 ;5 ( 1 ) : 1-10.
  • 3Gage FH, Bjorkund A, Stenevi U. Reinnervation of the partialely deaffer- ented hippocampus by compensatory collateral sprouting from spared cho- linergic and noradrenergic afferents[J].Brain Res, 1983 ;268:27-37.
  • 4Dunnett SB. Neural transplantation in animal models of dementia[J]. Eur J Neurosci, 1990 ;2:567-87.
  • 5He Y, Yao Z, Gu Y, et al. Nerve growth factor promotes collateral sprou- ting of cholinergic fibers in the septohippocampal cholinergic system of aged rats with fimbria transection[J].Brian Res, 1992 ;586( 1 ) :27-35.
  • 6Lindgren S, Rinder L. Experimental studies in head injury, I1. Pressure propagation in "percussion -contusion" [ J]. Biophysik, 1966; (2) :174- 80.
  • 7Dixon CE, Lyeth BG, Povlishock JT, et al. A fluid percussion model of ex- perimental brain injury in the rat [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 1987 ;67 (2) :110-9.
  • 8Mclntosh TK, Vink R, Noble L, et al. Traumatic brain injury in the rat; charaeterization of alateral fluid-pereussion model [ J ] . Neuroscience, 1989 ;28 ( 1 ) :233-44.
  • 9Lighthall JW, Dixon CE, Anderson TE. Experimental models of brain in- jury[J]. J Neurotrauma,1989;6(2) :83-97.
  • 10Grosswendt B. Ionisation cluster-size formation by electrons :from macro- scopic to nanometric target sizes [ J ]. Radiat Prot Dosimetry,2006;122: 437-45.

共引文献11

同被引文献4

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部