期刊文献+

构式切换中的间距效应 被引量:3

Interval effect in construction shift
原文传递
导出
摘要 构式切换是指一个表达中结构义的歧义解读,在疑问词复现结构中的体现则是时间性构式与非时间性构式的歧义。本研究考察这两种构式在疑问词复现结构中的内省切换与使用切换。语言内省表明,两种构式切换的可及性与疑问词复现间距有关。语料库分析则显示,两种构式实例的频率与疑问词复现间距也存在关联。这表明,时间性与非时间性的构式切换存在间距效应,即疑问词间距使得内省切换与使用切换具有相关关系:可及性越高,频率越高,反之亦然。这种间距效应超越动词-论元结构的适配关系,能解释复现疑问词长距离依存减弱的现象。 Construction shift refers to ambiguous readings of one expression,like the competition between temporal and atemporal readings of the construction characterized by duplicated interrogative pronouns.The introspective and usage-based shifts between these two interpretations have been ex-plored.Results show that,the introspective availability of temporal-atemporal constructions bears on the distance of duplicated interrogative pronouns and on the frequencies of temporal-atemporal constructions in the corpus.That is,the distance exerts an interval effect,leading to the correlation of the introspective shift with the usage shift,namely,the higher the availability,the higher the frequencies,and vice versa.This effect transcends the verb-argument correspondence and accounts for the long-distance dependency of duplicated interrogative pronouns.
机构地区 浙江大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期493-502,584,共10页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家社科基金项目"英汉汉英同声传译过程中的认知控制模型研究"(10CYY002) 教育部人文社科项目"英汉同声传译中的认知控制"(09YJC740065) 浙江省社科项目"同声传译过程中的工作记忆与双语控制"(08CGWW006YBQ) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"时空角度的复现结构考察"的阶段性成果
关键词 构式切换 间距效应 疑问词复现 时间性 construction shift interval effect duplicated interrogative pronouns temporality
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Ambridge, B., M. Pine, C. F. Rowland & F. Chang. 2012. The roles of verb semantics, en- trenchment, and morphophonology in the retreat from dative argument-structure overgeneral- ization errors [J]. Language 88(1): 45-81.
  • 2Amon, I. & N. Snider. 2010. More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases LJ]. Journal of Memory and Language 62(1) : 67-82.
  • 3Blumenthal-Dram6, A. 2012. Entrenchment in Usage-Based Theories: What Corpus Data Do and Do Not Reveal About the Mind E M ]. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
  • 4Bybee, J. L. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 5Bybee, J. L. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Cheng, L. & J. Huang. 1996. Two types of donkey sentences [J]. Natural Language Semantics 4(2) : 121-163.
  • 7Chierchia, G. 2000. Chinese conditional and the theory of conditionals [ J]. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9( 1 ) : 1-54.
  • 8Croft, W. 2008. On iconicity of distance E J ]. Cognitive Linguistics 19 ( 1 ) : 49-57.
  • 9Evans, V. 2006. Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction [ J ]. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4) : 491-534.
  • 10Goldberg, A. E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure [ M . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

二级参考文献124

共引文献182

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部