奥硝唑合剂与常规疗法治疗牙髓病的疗效比较

Comparasion of clinical efficacy of ornidazole mixture and conventional therapy on endodontics

目的：比较奥硝唑合剂与常规疗法治疗牙髓病的临床疗效。方法选择2010年11月至2013年12月收治的牙髓病患者92例，随机分为观察组和对照组，每组46例。对照组给予常规疗法治疗，观察组给予奥硝唑合剂治疗。对两组患者治疗后的暂时封堵治疗有效率和永久封堵治疗有效率进行比较。结果观察组患者的暂时封堵治疗有效率（91.30%）明显高于对照组（78.26%），差异有统计学意义（P ﹤0.05）。观察组患者的永久封堵治疗有效率（89.13%）明显高于对照组（60.87%），差异具有统计学意义（P ﹤0.05）。结论奥硝唑合剂在治疗牙髓病中，可明显提高暂时封堵治疗有效率和永久封堵治疗有效率，值得临床推广与应用。

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of ornidazole mixture and conventional therapy on endodontics. Methods Ninety-two patients with endodontics in the First People’s Hospital of Datong from November 2010 to December 2013 were selected and randomly divided into observation group and control group,with 46 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional therapy, while observation group was treated with ornidazole mixture. The efficiency of temporarily blocking and permanent closure of the patients in the two groups were compared. Results The efficiency of temporarily blocking in observation group（91. 30% ）was significantly higher than that of control group（78. 26% ）, and the difference was significant（P ﹤ 0. 05）. The efficiency of permanent closure in observation group （89. 13% ）was significantly higher than that of control group（60. 87% ）,and the difference was signifi-cant（P ﹤0. 05）. Conclusions Ornidazole mixture in the treatment of patients with endodontics can significantly enhance temporarily blocking efficiency and permanent closure efficiency,so it is worthy of clinical popularization and application.