摘要
目的:探讨预劈核在超声乳化白内障吸除术的应用及效果。方法将晶状体核硬度为III-IV级的单纯白内障患者519例(634只眼)随机分为预劈核组和非预劈核组。预劈核组(341只眼):不进行水分离、水分层,用劈核钩及截囊针将核分成四分后直接行超声乳化;非预劈核组(293只眼):传统方法水分离、水分层后,采用乳化劈核后行超声乳化。术中设定负压300 mmHg(1 mmHg =0.133 kPa);最大能量均为40%。记录术中使用的实际超声能量和时间、术前和术后1周的视力及角膜内皮细胞计数,观察术中术后手术并发症的发生情况。结果预劈核组及非预劈核组实际使用的超声能量分别为(16.36±6.65)%、(30.54±3.50)%;超声时间分别为(26±6) s、(93±41) s ;两组患者所用的实际超声能量和时间比较,均有显著差异( P <0.05)。两组患者术后视力比较,无显著差异( P =1.062)。两组患者角膜内皮细胞丢失率和角膜水肿程度比较,有显著差异( P <0.05)。结论预劈核超声乳化白内障吸除术操作简便,超声时间短,眼内组织损伤小。
Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of pre-chop before phacoemulsification.Methods In this study, 519 simple cataract patients (634 eyes) with III-IV nucleus hardness were randomly divided into two groups:pre-chop group, 341 eyes, and no-pre-chop group, 293 eyes.For patients in pre-chop group, instead of hydro-dissection, pa-tients received phacoemulsification after pre-chop by using chop and needle.In no-pre-chop group, patients received tradi-tional hydro-dissection and phacoemulsification.In each group, vacuum pressure was 300 mm Hg and the power was set to 40%.Actual phaco power, phaco time, visual acuity, corneal edema, endothelial cell loss, and other complications were recorded and compared between the two groups.Results The actual phaco power used were 16.36%±6.65% in pre-chop group and 30.54%±3.50% in no-pre-chop group, respectively.Phaco time was 26 ±6 sec versus 93 ±41 sec. These differences were significant ( P 〈0.05).Visual acuity significantly improved in all patients, and there was no difference between the two groups of patients.Endothelial cell loss and corneal edema were significant lower in the pre-chop group than in the no-pre-chop group.Conclusion The use of pre-chop before phacoemulsification reduced actual phaco power, phaco time, and loss of corneal endothelial cell, and chances of corneal edema.
出处
《临床眼科杂志》
2015年第4期297-299,共3页
Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology
关键词
预劈核
超声乳化
白内障
Pre-chop
Phacoemulsification
Cataract