期刊文献+

不同迭代重建强度对冠状动脉小内径支架显示影响的体外实验 被引量:6

Visual improvement for 3 mm or less coronary artery stent imaging by using different iterative reconstruction strength grade:An in vitro experiment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价联合基于原始数据的迭代重建(SAFIRE)与集成电子探测器在不同迭代重建强度下对直径≤3mm冠状动脉支架显示的影响。方法选取不同类型7枚内径3mm或2.5mm支架,释放于模拟冠状动脉血管的体外模型中,行配有Stelllar光子探测器的双源CT冠状动脉前瞻扫描,层厚0.5mm,按迭代重建强度Strength 1~4重建分为4组。对4组图像行双盲主观评价和客观评价[包括支架内径差异(ALN)、支架内腔衰减和图像噪声],对各组数据进行统计学分析。结果图像质量主观评分一致性较好(Kappa=0.77),Strength 2组获取的图像质量明显优于其他各组(P=0.034、0.046、0.015)。Strength 2组ALN值明显低于其他各组(P=0.013、0.009、0.005)。各组支架管腔内衰减差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。随着迭代强度增加,噪声明显降低。结论对于直径≤3mm支架,联合SAFIRE迭代强度2与集成电子探测器获取的图像质量整体最佳,可为临床提供质量更好的支架图像。 Objective To evaluate the influence on ≤3 mm coronary artery stent visualization by using different sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) strength grade combined with integrated circuit detector. Methods Seven 3 mm or 2.5 mm coronary artery stents were selected to make in-vitro coronary artery model. Prospective coronary artery scan using Definition Flash CT with Stellar detector was performed. The data by different iterative reconstruction strength grades (divided into Strength 1--4 group) with 0.5 mm slice thickness were reconstructed. Double-blind and independent qualitative and quantitative assessment including artificial lumen narrowing (ALN), luminal attenuation difference and im- age noise among groups were performed, and the differences between the groups were analyzed. Results The interobserv- er agreement for image subjective quality scores was good (Kappa=0. 77) , the image quality of the Strength 2 group was significantly higher than other groups (P=0. 034, 0. 046, 0. 015). The ALN of the Strength 2 group was the lowest, and had statistically significant differences between other groups (P= 0. 013, 0. 009, 0. 005). But the value of the lumin- al attenuation difference between the four groups all had no statistical significance (all P〉 0.05 ). With the increasing of the iterative reconstruction strength grades, the image noise decreased obviously. Conclusion For ≤3 mm coronary artery stents, combining integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction strength 2 can provide the best over-all image quality.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期1271-1275,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 冠状血管 支架 体层摄影术 X线计算机 图像处理 计算机辅助 Coronary vessels Stentsl Tomography, X-ray computed Image processing, computer-assisted
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Morsbach F, Desbiolles L, Plass A, et al. Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: Impact of an integrated circuit de- tector with iterative reconstruction. Invest Radiol, 2013,48 (1) : 32-40.
  • 2Von Spiczak J, Morsbach F, Winklhofer S, et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with CT using an integrated electronics detector and iterative reconstructions: First in vitro experience. J Cardiovascul Corn Tomogr, 2013,7(4) :215-222.
  • 3Andr~ F, Korosoglou G, Hosch W, et al. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coro- nary artery stents. Eur J Radiol, 2013,82(4) :601-607.
  • 4Zhou QJ, Jiang B, Dong F, et al. Computed tomography coro- nary stent imaging with iterative reconstruction: A trade-off study between medium kernel and sharp kernel. Comput Assist To- mogr, 2014,38(4) :604-612.
  • 5Yang WJ, Chen KM, Pang LF, et al. High-definition computed tomography for coronary artery stent imaging : A phantom study. Korean J Radiol, 2012,13(1) :20-26.
  • 6Baumueller S, Winklehner A, Karlo C, et al. Low-dose CT of the lung: Potential value of iterotive reconstructions. Eur Radiol, 2012,22(12) : 2597-2606.
  • 7Funama Y, Oda S, Utsunomiya D, et al. Coronary artery stent evaluation by combining iterative reconstruction and high-resolu- tion kernel at coronary CT angiography. Acad Radiol, 2012, 19 (11) : 1324-1331.
  • 8Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R, et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography {or coronary artery stent assessment: In vitro experi- ence. Invest Radiol, 2006,41(1):22-27.
  • 9von Spiczak J, Morsbach F, Winklhofer S, et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with CT using an integrated electronics detector and iterative reconstructions: First in vitro experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr, 2013,7(4) :215-222.
  • 10Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, et al. Randomized com- parison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tornography coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery dis- ease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008,1(2) : 177-186.

同被引文献41

  • 1Harald S, Murat O, Rainer R, et al. 64-Versus 16-slice CT an- giography for coronary artery stent assessment: in v/tro experience [J]. Invest Radiol, 2006, 41(1): 22-27.
  • 2Ehara M, Surme.ly JF, Kawai M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically sig- nificant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive pa- tient population: cmnparison with conventional invasive angiogra- phy[J]. Cir J Off J Jap Cir Soc, 2006, 70(5): 564-571.
  • 3Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/ AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Car- diovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Hear Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiol- ogy Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovas- cular Computed Tomography [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009, 53(6): 530-553.
  • 4Florian A, Grigorios K, Waldemar H, et al. Performance of dual source versus 256-slice multi-slice CT in the evaluation of 16 coronary artery stents[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(4): 601-607.
  • 5Fabian M, Lotus D, Andra P, et al. Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an itegrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction[J]. Invest Radiol, 2013, 480): 32-40.
  • 6Donati OF, Burg MC, Desbiolles L. High-pitch 128-slice dual- source CT for the assessment of coronary stents in a phantom model[J]. Acad Radiol, 2010, 17(11): 1366-1374.
  • 7Eisentopf J, Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, et al. Low-dose dual- source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation[J]. Jacc Cardiovascular Imaging, 2013, 6(4): 458-465.
  • 8Ulrich A, Burg MC, Raupach R, et al. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using differ- ent convolution kernels and postprocessing filters [J]. Acta Radiol, 2015, 56(1): 42-50.
  • 9Achenbach S, Ropers U, Kuettner A, et al. Randomized com- parison of 64-slice single- and dual-source computed tomogra- phy coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease[J]. Jacc Cardiovasc Imaging, 2008, 1(2): 177-186.
  • 10Spiczak JV, Morsbach F, Winklhofer S, et al. Coronary artery stent imaging with CT using an integrated electronics detector and iterative reconstructions: first in vitro experience [J]. J Car- diovasc Comput Tomogr, 2013, 7(4): 215-222.

引证文献6

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部