期刊文献+

全球贸易治理模式之分析——以区域贸易协定为视角 被引量:16

Analysis of Modes of Global Trade Governance: A Perspective from Regional Trade Agreements
原文传递
导出
摘要 进入新世纪以来,以WTO为核心的多边贸易体系陷入发展低谷;而以新一代区域贸易协定为特征的区域化则一再提速,进入发展快轨。此次区域化潮流与以往区域化运动有明显差异,并被广泛视为制定下一代国际贸易规则的重要途径,从而对当前以多边贸易体系为核心的全球贸易治理模式构成挑战。然而区域化模式的全球贸易治理存在内生缺陷。要实现有效的全球贸易治理,必须要以两者互补性竞争关系为基础,搭建多边为核心、区域化为补充的治理模式。 The regionalism featuring new regional trade agreements has been developing rapidly while the WTO-centered multilateral trading system has stalled in the last decade. The latest trend of regionalism aims at developing a new set of rules based on the new mode of international trade, which, therefore, constitutes a challenge to multilateralism, the existing mode of global trade governance. The mode of regionalism, however, has inherent flaws in global trade governance. Recognizing the complementary-competitive relationship between multilateralism and regionalism, the effective global trade governance can only be achieved through a mode that centers around multilateralism, with regionalism as a necessary complement.
作者 钟楹
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第8期77-89,共13页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 对外经济贸易大学国内外培养研究生项目
关键词 全球贸易治理 多边贸易体系 WTO 区域贸易协定 区域化 global trade governance multilateral trading system WTO regional trade agreements regionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Abbott, R. 2012. The Future of the Multilateral Trading System and the WTO [A], in Ricardo Mel6ndez-Ortiz M., Bellmann C., and Rodriguez Mendoza M., The Future and the WTO:Confronting the Challenges [C], Geneva:ICTSD: 12-15.
  • 2Baldwin, R.. 2014. Multilateralising 21st Century Regionalsim [J/OL]. http://www.oecd.org/tad/events/OECD-gft- 2014-multilateralising-21 st-century-regionalism-baldwin-paper.pdf.
  • 3Bellmann, C., Hepburn, J. and Wilke, M.. 2012, The Challenges Facing the Multilateral Trading System in Addressing Global Public Policy Objectives [A], in Carbonnier G., International Development Policy:Aid, Emerging Economies and Global Policies [C] UK:Palgrave Macmillan: 117-140.
  • 4Borchert, I. 2009. Trade Diversion under Selective Preferential Market Access [J], Canadian Journal of Economics 42: 1390-1410.
  • 5Gallagher, K. 2012. Challenging Opportunities for the Multilateral Trade Regime [A], in Ricardo Mel6ndez-Ortiz M., Bellmann C., and Rodriguez Mendoza M., The Future and the WTO:Confronting the Challenges [C], Geneva:ICTSD: 16-21.
  • 6Horn, H., Mavroidis, P., and Sapir, A. 2009. Beyond the WTO? An Anatomy of ELI and US Preferential Trade Agreements [M], Brussels:BRUEGEL: 1-4.
  • 7Kawai, M., and Wignaraja, G. 2013. Patterns of Free Trade Areas in Asia [M], Honolulu:East-West Center.
  • 8Keohane, R. 2006. The Contingent Legitimacy of Multilateralism [A], in Newman E., Thakur R. and Tirman J., Multilateralism Under Challenge:Power, Interantional Structure, and World Order [C], Tokyo:United Nations University Press:56-76.
  • 9Lawrence, R. 2012. Competing with Regionalism by Revitalizing the WTO [A], in Ricardo Mel6ndez-Ortiz M., Bellmann C., and Rodriguez Mendoza M., The Future and the WTO:Confronting the Challenges [C], Geneva:ICTSD: 38-41.
  • 10Matsushita, M, 2014. A View on Future Roles of The WTO:Should There be More Soft Law in The WTO? [J] J Int Economic Law 17 (3):701-715.

同被引文献244

引证文献16

二级引证文献53

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部