期刊文献+

Obtaining research biopsies during pediatric colonoscopy: Safety and adverse events 被引量:1

Obtaining research biopsies during pediatric colonoscopy: Safety and adverse events
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To investigate the safety profile of acquiring additional intestinal biopsies for research purposes in children undergoing a medically indicated colonoscopy. METHODS: A retrospective review of 122 pediatric patients who underwent colonoscopy over a 9 mo time period was completed. 38/122 participants consented to a research study in which 4 additional biopsies were obtained, in addition to routine biopsies. The outcomes after colonoscopy were measured in the research participants, and compared to 84 control participants who did not consent for the study. Groups were compared with regard to number of biopsies obtained, underlying diagnosis, and both serious and minor adverse outcomes. Data was collected including: age, gender, race, indication, diagnosis, number of biopsies obtained per case and post procedure adverse events. Medical records were reviewed and a questionnaire was completed by each of the ten gastroenterologists who performed procedures during the study. Physicians were asked about individual patient outcomes to ensure that all adverse events, such as perforation, excessive bleeding, infection, and minor gastrointestinal outcomes, were captured and included.RESULTS: The research group had more biopsies obtained(mean = 13.58 ± 4.21) compared to controls(mean = 9.33 ± 4.40), P ≤ 0.0001, however there was no difference in adverse events. Serious outcomes, defined as perforation, bleeding and infection, did not occur, in either group. As such, the relationship between serious adverse events and number of biopsies obtained was not determined. Minor gastrointestinal outcomes, such as abdominal pain, diarrhea or vomiting, were reported in 21 patients(8 research participants and 13 control participants) however the incidence of minor gastrointestinal outcomes between the two groups did not vary significantly, P = 0.45. Additionally, the meannumber of biopsies obtained in patients who had a minor outcome(mean = 12.1 ± 0.77), compared to those with no adverse outcome(mean = 10.34 ± 0.5), revealed no statistical difference between the groups(P = 0.12), suggesting that number of biopsies is not associated with incidence of minor adverse events.CONCLUSION: Patients participating in research requiring acquisition of additional biopsies for research purposes alone, are not at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. AIM: To investigate the safety profile of acquiringadditional intestinal biopsies for research purposes inchildren undergoing a medically indicated colonoscopy.METHODS: A retrospective review of 122 pediatricpatients who underwent colonoscopy over a 9 mo timeperiod was completed. 38/122 participants consentedto a research study in which 4 additional biopsies wereobtained, in addition to routine biopsies. The outcomesafter colonoscopy were measured in the researchparticipants, and compared to 84 control participants whodid not consent for the study. Groups were comparedwith regard to number of biopsies obtained, underlyingdiagnosis, and both serious and minor adverse outcomes.Data was collected including: age, gender, race, indication,diagnosis, number of biopsies obtained per case andpost procedure adverse events. Medical records werereviewed and a questionnaire was completed by each ofthe ten gastroenterologists who performed proceduresduring the study. Physicians were asked about individualpatient outcomes to ensure that all adverse events, suchas perforation, excessive bleeding, infection, and minorgastrointestinal outcomes, were captured and included.RESULTS: The research group had more biopsiesobtained (mean = 13.58 ± 4.21) compared to controls(mean = 9.33 ± 4.40), P ≤ 0.0001, however therewas no difference in adverse events. Serious outcomes,defined as perforation, bleeding and infection, did notoccur, in either group. As such, the relationship betweenserious adverse events and number of biopsies obtainedwas not determined. Minor gastrointestinal outcomes,such as abdominal pain, diarrhea or vomiting, werereported in 21 patients (8 research participants and 13control participants) however the incidence of minorgastrointestinal outcomes between the two groups didnot vary significantly, P = 0.45. Additionally, the meannumber of biopsies obtained in patients who had aminor outcome (mean = 12.1 ± 0.77), compared tothose with no adverse outcome (mean = 10.34 ± 0.5),revealed no statistical difference between the groups(P = 0.12), suggesting that number of biopsies is notassociated with incidence of minor adverse events.CONCLUSION: Patients participating in research requiringacquisition of additional biopsies for research purposesalone, are not at an increased risk of adverse outcomes.
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 CAS 2015年第7期736-740,共5页 世界胃肠内镜杂志(英文版)(电子版)
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Fisher DA, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Cash BD, Decker GA,Early DS, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R,Jue TL, Khan KM, Malpas PM, Sharaf RN, Shergill AK, DominitzJA. Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:745-752 [PMID: 21951473].
  • 2Ko CW, Dominitz JA. Complications of colonoscopy: magnitudeand management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2010; 20:659-671 [PMID: 20889070 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.005].
  • 3Thakkar K, El-Serag HB, Mattek N, Gilger M. Complicationsof pediatric colonoscopy: a five-year multicenter experience. ClinGastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 515-520 [PMID: 18356115 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.01.007].
  • 4Levin TR, Zhao W, Conell C, Seeff LC, Manninen DL, Shapiro JA,Schulman J. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated healthcare delivery system. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 880-886 [PMID:17179057 DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-12-200612190-00004].
  • 5Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, Saskin R, Leddin D, GrunfeldE, Wai E, Goldwasser M, Sutradhar R, Stukel TA. Bleeding andperforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors inusual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1899-1906,1906.e1 [PMID: 18938166 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.058].
  • 6Hsu EK, Chugh P, Kronman MP, Markowitz JE, Piccoli DA,Mamula P. Incidence of perforation in pediatric GI endoscopy andcolonoscopy: an 11-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77:960-966 [PMID: 23433599 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.12.020].
  • 7Iqbal CW, Askegard-Giesmann JR, Pham TH, Ishitani MB, MoirCR. Pediatric endoscopic injuries: incidence, management, andoutcomes. J Pediatr Surg 2008; 43: 911-915 [PMID: 18485965DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.12.036].
  • 8Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screeningfor colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of theevidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann InternMed 2002; 137: 132-141 [PMID: 12118972].
  • 9Tam YH, Lee KH, Chan KW, Sihoe JD, Cheung ST, MouJW. Colonoscopy in Hong Kong Chinese children. World JGastroenterol 2010; 16: 1119-1122 [PMID: 20205284].
  • 10Navaneethan U, Parasa S, Venkatesh PG, Trikudanathan G,Shen B. Prevalence and risk factors for colonic perforation duringcolonoscopy in hospitalized inflammatory bowel disease patients. JCrohns Colitis 2011; 5: 189-195 [PMID: 21575880 DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2010.12.005].

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部