关于“大贵州滩”

About the “Great Bank of Guizhou”

在20世纪90年代,Lehrmann等把中国南方贵州省南部罗甸地区早三叠世的一个孤立的"罗甸碳酸盐岩台地",称作"大贵州滩"。在国外,已有300多篇文章引用"大贵州滩"这一术语。笔者等曾对中国南方早及中三叠世的岩相古地理进行过研究,根据我们的地质资料,在贵州省南部的罗甸地区,在早三叠世,只有一个孤立的"罗甸碳酸盐岩台地",没有"大贵州滩",也不能把"罗甸碳酸盐岩台地"称作"大贵州滩"。《古地理学报》(英文版)2015年第4卷第1期,刊登了冯增昭等的文章,There was no"Great Bank of Guizhou"in the Early Triassic in Guizhou Province,South China(中国南方贵州省早三叠世没有"大贵州滩")。本文是该英文文章的详细摘要,目的在于让国内的广大读者也知道:"大贵州滩"这一术语是严重的名不副实,不应继续使用。

In 1990s, Lehrmann et al. called the Early Triassic isolated ＂Luodian Carbonate Plat- form＂ in the Luodian area of southern Guizhou Province in South China as the ＂Great Bank of Guizhou＂. This term ＂Great Bank of Guizhou＂ was cited in more than 300 articles in foreign countries. The authors of this paper have studied the lithofacies palaeogeography of the Early and Middle Triassic in South China. According to the geological data of us, in the Early Triassic and in the Luodian area of southern Guizhou Province, there was only an isolated ＂ Luodian Carbonate Platform＂, but there was no ＂Great Bank of Guizhou＂. The isolated ＂ Luodian Carbonate platform＂ should not be called as the ＂ Great Bank of Guizhou＂. This paper is a detailed abstract of the English article There was no ＂Great Bank of Guizhou＂ in the Early Triassic in Guizhou Province, South China （Journal of Palaeogeoraphy （English Edition） , 2015, 4 （1） ）. The aim of this paper is to let Chinese readers understand that the term ＂Great Bank of Guizhou＂ did not match the reality seriously and should not be used any more.