摘要
《刑事诉讼法》修改中,将"事实是证据"改为"材料是证据"是用西方国家的形式证据观取代了我国的实质证据观,是证据观的倒退。移植的证据排除规则对于排除物证、书证来说是反科学的。移植的"排除合理怀疑"的盖然性标准也不科学,因为盖然性根本不能作标准。移植的"无罪拟制"只是一个既不发生法律效力、更不能执行的虚假拟制。这次修改纠正了起诉不移送案卷的做法,但又允许侦查阶段委托辩护人。这是在侦查中虚构了控、辩关系。以上内容已使我国的证据制度具有了中西结合的倾向。如果按这一倾向继续走下去,中国的证据制度必将以"西化"而告终。我国的目标应当是:不要西化要创新。因为,创新才是硬道理。
The criminal procedure law changes" the fact is evidence" instead of "the material evidence". Evidence in the form of view evidence replaced the essence of our view of western countries is the concept of evidence. Transplantation to exclude evidence elimination rule Card is anti-science, documentary evidence. Transplant "beyond a reasonable doubt" of the probability of standard is not scientific, because the probability of root. This cannot serve as a standard. Transplantation of the drafting "not guilty" is neither a legally effective, more cannot perform a false artificial. The revision corrected the prosecution is not transferred to the books, but also allows the investigation phase to entrust persons as his defenders. This is a fiction in the inve has stigation. The relationship between evidence system of our country has control, able to contend. The above content the tendency of the combination of Chinese and western. If this trend to continue, China's evidence system will be ended in the "westernization". Our goal should be:don't westernization to innovation. Because innovation is the absolute principle.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第9期12-28,共17页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
刑事诉讼法
证据制度
证据观
西化
创新
the criminal procedure law
evidence system
view of evidence
westernized
innovation