论特殊动产物权变动“内外有别”的规则——兼评《买卖合同司法解释》第10条

View the Real Right Transfer Rules' “Different Inside and Outside”of the Special Personal Property——Comment on Article 10 of the Judicial Interpretation of Contract of Sales

《买卖合同司法解释》第10条确立了特殊动产多重买卖物权变动之裁判规则,交付与登记在特殊动产物权变动中的法律地位如何也引发学者的再次思考。根据《物权法》的规定,我国特殊动产物权变动的规则是交付生效、登记对抗。交付是当事人之间物权变动的要件,登记是物权变动对抗善意第三人的要件。单纯的交付不能产生对抗善意第三人的效力。登记的对抗力产生于因交付取得物权的基础之上;单纯的登记不会导致物权变动,也不能产生对抗力。特殊动产的物权变动要件和公示方式内外有别,并不同一,交付和登记各在其法律效力范围内产生作用。

The Article 10 of the Judicial Interpretation of Contract of Sales prescribes a rule of adjudication multiple transaction of special personal properties, also how legal status delivery and registration are in the transfer of special personal property cause scholars＂ re-thinking. According to the Real Right Law, the transfer of the special personal property abides by the principles of ＂delivery to t^ke effect＂ ＆ ＂resistance effect of registration＂. Delivery id the requirement of validity of the real right transfer of the special personal property between parties, and registraffon makes the real right to get the conditions to fight against a third person in good faith. Simple delivery can not be effective to fight against the boon third party. The reason why registration can fight is because the buyer gets the real right based on delivery; simple registration does not lead to the real right transfer, either generate effect of fighting. Elements and public ways of the Real Right Transfer Rules of the Special Personal Property are ＂different inside and outside＂ and not the same, delivery and registration play roles within the scope of their legal effect.