期刊文献+

儒家“义利之辨”的基本内涵及其当代意义 被引量:20

The Basic Connotation of Confucian Distinction between Righteousness and Benefit and Its Contemporary Significance
原文传递
导出
摘要 根本否定儒家"义利之辨"在今天仍具有积极意义、将儒家"义利之辨"的基本精神归结为义利对立基础上的取义舍利或重义轻利、认为儒家"义利之辨"中包含了主张"以义取利"的内容,是误解儒家"义利之辨"的三种有代表性的观点。儒家"义利之辨"包含了四个方面的基本内容:第一,明确反对见利忘义;第二,肯定合理之利的正当性;第三,在动机上反对"以义求利",但在结果上可以接受"因义得利";第四,在特殊情况下则牺牲利益而成就道义,其极端的情况就是孔子所谓"杀身成仁"、孟子所谓"舍生取义"。综而言之,儒家"义利之辨"归根结底体现为一种"义以为上"即以德性的要求作为人之所以为人的安身立命之本的精神追求。儒家"义利观"对于现代人仍能起到相当程度的警醒作用。 There are three representative viewpoints, which misunderstand Confucian distinction between righteousness and benefit. The first one negates fundamentally it's positive significance in today, the second one attributes it's basic spirit to opposite foundation of righteousness and benefit, the third one believes that it contains getting benefit via righteousness. The basic content of Confucian distinction between righteousness and benefit includes four aspects, namely: first, opposes clearly unscrupulous actions; second, confirms the legitimacy of reasonable benefit; the third, objects to getting benefit through righteousness as a tool in motivation, but we can accept benefit because of righteousness in consequence; fourth, achieves morality at the expense of the interests in the special case, the extreme is Confucius, the so-called martyrdom, Mencius, the so-called sacrifice for justice. In a word, Confucian distinction between righteousness and benefit embodies finally a kind of spirit pursuit of righteousness is above everything else, that is, regarding the requirements of virtue as the true man's root of the ultimate concern. The Confucian idea between righteousness and benefit can still play role of alert level for modern people.
作者 李翔海
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第8期16-22,15,共8页 Academic Monthly
基金 国家社科基金重大项目(13&ZD056)的阶段性成果
关键词 义利之辨 见得思义 义然后取 因义得利 义以为上 distinction between righteousness and benefit, getting then thinking of righteousness, righteousness then getting, benefit because of righteousness, righteousness is above everything else
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献8

  • 1张法.谈谈后现代及其与中国文化的关联[J].文艺研究,1997(5):16-21. 被引量:19
  • 2马克斯·韦伯.新教伦理与资本主义精神[M].四川人民出版社,1986.160.
  • 3大卫·格里芬.后现代科学[M].北京:中央编译出版社,1995,11..
  • 4胡适.读梁漱溟先生《东西文化及其哲学》//胡适文存(第二集第2卷).上海:亚东图书馆,1930.
  • 5陈序经.对于一般怀疑全盘西化者的一个浅说//全盘西化言论集.岭南大学青年会,1934.
  • 6包亚明.福柯访谈录—权力的眼睛.严峰,译.上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
  • 7雅思贝斯.历史的起源与目标.魏楚雄,等,泽.北京:华夏出版社,1989.
  • 8刘述先.时代与哲学//中国哲学与现代化.台北:时报出版公司,1980.

共引文献14

同被引文献123

引证文献20

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部