期刊文献+

微小牛蜱中肠内容物菌群结构分析 被引量:8

Analysis of microflora in midgut contents from Boophilus microplus ticks
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析不同阶段的雌、雄微小牛蜱中肠内容物的细菌种群结构,为蜱及蜱传病防治提供科学依据。方法无菌收集微小牛蜱中肠内容物,以试剂盒提取细菌总DNA,通过通用引物PCR扩增16SrDNA V3区并进行DGGE电泳,选取9条优势条带进行回收克隆测序。结果微小牛蜱中肠优势菌9种,包括拉乌尔特立克次氏体,克雷伯菌,假单胞菌,生癌肠杆菌,阪崎肠杆菌,斯洛伐克立克次氏体,欧文氏菌,泛生菌,柯克斯氏体,其中,克雷伯菌、斯洛伐克立克次氏体、柯克斯氏体见于不同阶段的雌、雄微小牛蜱肠道;欧文氏菌、生癌肠杆菌仅见于雄成蜱,而泛生菌仅见于雌成蜱;阪崎肠杆菌只见于饱成蜱;雌蜱产卵后,肠道泛生菌、拉乌尔特立克次氏体优势消失;产卵5d后,蜱肠道菌群结构基本稳定。结论不同阶段的雌、雄微小牛蜱中肠内容物的细菌种群结构存在一定程度的差别。 Objective To analyze microflora in midgut contents from Boophilus microplus ticks of different sexes and stages in order to provide a scientific basis for prevention of ticks and tick borne diseases. Method Midgut contents were collected and a kit was used to extract total DNA under sterile conditions. The sequence of the 16S rRNA V3 region was amplified with universal primers and analyzed using DGGE. Nine predominant bands were obtained, and the 16S rRNA gene was cloned and sequenced. Results Nine strains of bacteria were identified, including Rickettsia raoultii, Klebsiella spp, Pseudornonas spp, Enterobacter cancerogenus, Cronobacter spp, Rickettsia slovaca, Erwinia chrysanthemi, Pantoea spp, and Coxiella spp, Klebsiella spp, Rickettsia slovaca, and Coxiella spp. were the predominant bacteria in B. rnicroplus of both sexes and different stages. Erwinia spp and E. cancerogenus were only present in male ticks and Pantoea spp was only present in females. Cronobacter spp were isolated from fed ticks. Pantoea spp. and Rickettsia raoultii were no longer the predominant bacteria once females had laid eggs. The composition of intestinal flora was essentially consistent 5 days after eggs were laid. Conclusion There were some differences in microflora in midgut contents from B. microplus ticks of different sexes and stages.
出处 《中国病原生物学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期487-490,共4页 Journal of Pathogen Biology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.31372431)
关键词 DGGE 微小牛蜱 肠道内容物 产卵 DGGE Boophilus microplus tick midgut contents egg laying
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1朱振勤,陈季武,夏明仪.吸血期蓖麻硬蜱雌虫体内周身性莱姆病螺旋体生长动态的组织学研究[J].中国人兽共患病杂志,1998,14(3):16-20. 被引量:4
  • 2Smith TA, Driscoll T, Gillespie JJ, et al. A Coxiella-like endo- symbiont is a potential vitamin source for the Lone Star Tick [J]. Genome Biol Evol, 2015, 7(3) 831-8.
  • 3Zimmer K, Seixas A, Termignoni C, et al. Cattle tick-associated bacteria exert anti-biofilm and anti Tritrichomonas foetus activi ties[J]. Vet Microbiol. , 2013, 164(1-2) 171-6.
  • 4Narasimhan S, Rajeevan N, Liu L, et al. Gut Microbiota of the tick vector Is'odes scapularis modulate colonization of the Lyme disease spirochete[J]. Cell Host Microbe, 2014, 15(1): 58-71.
  • 5Schabereiter-Gurtner C, Lubitz W, R lleke S. Application of broad-range 16S rRNA PCR amplification and DGGE fingerprint- ing for detection of tick-infecting bacteria[J]. J Microbiol Meth ods, 2003, 52(2): 251-60.
  • 6Halos L, Mavris M, Vourc'h G, et al. Broad range PCR-TTGE for the first line detection of bacterial pathogen DNA in ticks[J]. Veterinary Res, 2006, 37(2): 245 53.
  • 7Van Overbeek L, Gassner F, van der Plas CL, et al. Diversity of Ia'odes ricinus tick associated bacterial communities from different forests[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2008, 66(1), 72-84.
  • 8李春红,周勇志,赵素华,刘毅,张厚双,曹杰,周金林.长角血蜱肠道细菌的分离与鉴定[J].中国预防兽医学报,2011,33(8):611-614. 被引量:9
  • 9Subramanian G, Sekeyova Z, Raoult D, et al. Multiple tick asso- ciated bacteria in Ixodes ricinus from Slovakia[J]. Ticks Tick Borne Dis, 2012, 3(5): 406-10.
  • 10Xu XL, Cheng TY, Yang H, et al. Identification of intestinal bacterial flora in Rhipicephalus microplus ticks by conventional methods and PCR-DGGE analysis[J]. Exp Appl Acarol, 2015, 66(2): 257-68.

二级参考文献77

共引文献43

同被引文献54

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部