期刊文献+

正常前列腺组织磁共振弥散加权成像在不同b值下的最优拟合模型研究 被引量:7

A study on the best fi tting model for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal prostate tissue at different b-values
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比双指数弥散模型和弥散峰度模型对正常前列腺组织的弥散加权成像在1.5 T不同b值分段下的拟合效果。材料与方法采集11例健康男性前列腺T2加权成像和弥散加权磁共振的多b值成像,从0到3000 s/mm2中选取31个b值,将两个弥散模型对弥散加权信号原始数据作曲线拟合,根据曲线拟合计算的拟合信号强度值与原始图像采集的信号值的差值大小,选取对某个模型该差值都较小的对应的连续多个b值,组成一个分段,该模型则为此b值分段最优的拟合模型。结果在所有b值数据的整体拟合中,双指数弥散模型调整后的决定系数R2大于弥散峰度模型。b值在500~1000 s/mm2时,弥散峰度模型的均方根误差比双指数弥散模型更小;b值在0~500 s/mm2和1000~3000 s/mm2时,双指数弥散模型的均方根误差比弥散峰度模型更小。结论双指数弥散模型和弥散峰度模型对正常前列腺的弥散加权成像在不同的b值下的拟合优度不同,不同b值分段具有不同的最优拟合模型,将两个模型结合起来对前列腺弥散加权成像进行分析可能会为临床的诊断提供更多的帮助。 Objective:To compare the fitting behavior of biexponential diffusion model and diffusion kurtosis model (DKI) on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of healthy prostate at different b-values at 1.5 T.Materials and Methods:T2-weighted imaging and DWI of prostate was performed on 11 healthy man with 31 b-values ranging from 0 to 3000 s/mm2. The DWI signals were iftted into two diffusion models. The continuous b-values with smaller deviation between the signal intensities of iftted curves of one model and the acquired original data can be combined into one section. The best iftting model could be selected for the b-values sections.Results:The adjusted R2 of the full b-values for biexponential diffusion model was bigger than that for DKI. The RMSE of DKI was smaller than biexponential model with b-values from 500 to 1000 s/mm2, and the RMSE of biexponential diffusion model was smaller than DKI with b-values ranging from 0 to 500 s/mm2 and from 1000 to 3000 s/mm2.Conclusion:For DWI of prostate, biexponential diffusion model and DKI behaviors diversely on the goodness of iftting at different b-values. The different b-values sections can be iftted best with different diffusion models. It may potentially provide more help for clinical diagnosis when combining the biexponential diffusion model and DKI.
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS CSCD 2015年第8期631-635,共5页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81371537)
关键词 双指数弥散模型 弥散峰度模型 前列腺 弥散磁共振成像 磁共振成像 Biexponential diffusion model Diffusion kurtosis model Prostate Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Mazaheri Y, Shukla-Dave A, Muellner A, et al. MR imaging of the prostate in clinical practice.Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine, 2008, 21(6): 379-392.
  • 2陈爱萍,李惠民,于红,刘士远,肖湘生.表观扩散系数与非小细胞肺癌病理基础初探[J].磁共振成像,2014,5(1):40-44. 被引量:14
  • 3Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1965, 42(1): 288-292.
  • 4Quentin M, Blondin D, Klasen J, et al. Comparison of different mathematical models of diffusion-weighted prostate MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 30(10): 1468-1474.
  • 5Yuan J, Yeung DK, Mok GS, et al. Non-Gaussian analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in head and neek at 3T: a pilot study in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87024.
  • 6Shinmoto H, Oshio K, Tanimoto A, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 27(3): 355-359.
  • 7Liu X, Peng W, Zhou L, et al. Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients values in the prostate: comparison among normal tissue,prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis. Korean J Radiol, 2013, 14(2): 222-232.
  • 8Mulkem RV, Barnes AS, Haker S J, et al. Biexponentiai characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. Magn Reson Imaging, 2006, 24(5): 563-568.
  • 9Jensen JH, Helpem JA, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005, 53(6): 1432-1440.
  • 10张荷焕,穆学涛,王宏.3.0T MR扩散加权成像对泪腺上皮性肿瘤的诊断价值[J].磁共振成像,2014,5(3):182-188. 被引量:1

二级参考文献35

  • 1毕颖文,陈荣家.泪腺占位性病变的临床病理学分析[J].中华眼科杂志,2005,41(10):877-881. 被引量:16
  • 2Delahunt B, Bethwaite PB, Nacey JN. Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumours divided according to histological subtype. Pathology, 2007, 39 (5): 459-465.
  • 3Yu X, Lin M, Ouyang H, et al. Application of ADC measurement in characterization of renal cell carcinomas with different pathological types and grades by 3.0 T diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol, 2012,81 (11): 3061-3066.
  • 4Hoff BA, Chenevert TL, Bhojani MS, et al. Assessment of multiexponential diffusion features as MRI cancer therapy response metrics. Magn Reson Med, 2010, 64(5): 1499-1509.
  • 5Zhang JL, Sigmund EE, Chandarana H, et al. Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification. Radiology, 2010, 254 (3): 783-792.
  • 6Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 2007, 188(6): 1622-1635.
  • 7Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol, 1982, 6 (7): 655-663.
  • 8Ghavamian R, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery. J Urol, 2002, 168(2): 454-459.
  • 9Kono K, Inoue Y, Nakayama K, et al. The role of diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2001, 22 (6): 1081-1088.
  • 10Rosenkrantz AB, Niver BE, Fitzgerald EF, et al. Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 195 (5): W344-351.

共引文献20

同被引文献69

  • 1李飞宇,王霄英,许玉峰,肖江喜,蒋学祥.不同年龄段正常成人前列腺外周带ADC值的初步研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(12):1496-1499. 被引量:16
  • 2Le Bihan D. Diffusion MRI: what water tells us about the brain. EMBO Mol Med, 2014, 6(5): 569-573.
  • 3Basset P J, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusiontensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B, 1994, 103 (3): 247-254.
  • 4Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Hedehus M, et al. Age-related declinein brain white matter anisotropy measured with spatially corrected echo-planar diffusion tensorimaging. Magn Reson Med, 2000, 44(2): 259-268.
  • 5Bennett IJ, Madden DJ, Vaidya CJ, et al. Age-related differences in multiple measures of white matter integrity: a diffusion tensor imaging study of healthy aging. Hum BrainMapp, 2010, 31(3): 378-390.
  • 6Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, et al. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states ofbrain tissue: implications for diffusion-weighted imaging. MagnReson Med, 1996, 36(6): 847-857.
  • 7Assaf Y, Cohen Y. Non-mono-exponential attenuation of water andN-acetyl aspartate signals due to diffusion in brain tissue. J Magn Reson, 1998, 131(1): 69-85.
  • 8Jeurissen B, Leemans A, TournierJ D, et al. Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapp, 2013, 34(11): 2747-2766.
  • 9Salminen LE, Conturo TE, Laidlaw DH. Regional age differences in gray matter diffusivity among healthyolder adults. Brain Imaging Behav, 2015. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 10Maier SE, Mulkem RV. Biexponential analysis of diffusion- related signal decay in normal humancortical and deep gray matter. Magn Reson Imaging, 2008, 26(7): 897-904.

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部