期刊文献+

胎膜早破对分娩方式的影响及产程观察 被引量:3

Effects of premature rupture of membranes on delivery mode and birth process
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨胎膜早破对产妇分娩方式及其产程的影响。方法选取2012年1月~2014年4月我院胎膜早破患者120例作为研究对象(观察组),选取同时期足月无胎膜早破正常产妇120例作为对照组,分析两组不同病情产妇对分娩方式、产程的影响。结果观察组阴道顺产率、剖宫产率分别为65.8%、34.2%,对照组则分别为78.3%、21.7%,观察组剖宫产率显著地高于对照组(x2=4.659,P=0.031)。观察组总产程时间、第二产程时间分别为(758.2±116.1)min、(92.6±12.8)min,均显著地高于对照组的(425.8±89.6)min、(38.4±4.1)min(t=24.829,P=0.000;t=44.174,P=0.000)。结论胎膜早破会提高剖宫产分娩率和延长产程时间,这可能与胎膜早破导致难产相关。 Objective To investigate effect of premature rupture of membranes on delivery mode and birth process. Methods 120 cases of patients with premature rupture of membranes from January 2012 to April 2014 in our hospital were selected as observation group, 120 cases of normal pregnant women were selected as control group. Effect of two groups on delivery mode and birth process were analyzed. Results The cesarean section rate of observation group was 34.2 % , which was significantly higher than that of control group (21.7 % )(x2=4.659, P=0.031). The vaginal delivery rate of observation group was 65.8%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group(78.3%)(x2=4.659, P=0.031). The total labor time, and the second stage of labor time of observation group were(758.2±116.1)min, (92.6±12.8)min, which were significantly higher than those of the control group(425.8±89.6)min, (38.4±4.1)min (t=24.829, P=0.000; t=44.174, P=0.000). Conclusion Premature rupture of membranes will increase the cesarean section rate and prolong the time of birth process, which was related with premature rupture of membranes resulting in dystocia.
作者 曹凤妹
出处 《中国医药科学》 2015年第10期74-75,123,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 胎膜早破 分娩 产程 Premature rupture of membranes Delivery Birth process
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献80

  • 1李春华.胎膜早破与分娩方式的关系及产程观察护理[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2006,27(15). 被引量:2
  • 2李玮,漆洪波.未足月胎膜早破的研究进展[J].中华围产医学杂志,2005,8(1):57-59. 被引量:157
  • 3刘圣英.早产胎膜早破141例临床分析[J].安徽医药,2005,9(6):453-454. 被引量:9
  • 4陈红.182例胎膜早破剖宫产指征探讨[J].现代医药卫生,2005,21(19):2639-2639. 被引量:3
  • 5Ayaz A, Saeed S, Farooq M U, et al. Pre-labor rupture of membranes at term in patients with an unfavorable cervix: active versus conservative management [J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2008,47(2) : 192-196.
  • 6Ara J, Noorami M. Induction of labour with oral misoprostol for prelabour rupture of mimbranes at term [J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2005,55(5) : 180-183.
  • 7Da-Graca-Krupa F, Cecatti J G, de-Castro-Surita F G, et al. Misoprostol versus expectant management in premature rupture of mimbranes at term [J]. BJOG, 2005,112(9) : 1284-1290.
  • 8Frohn W E, Simmons S, Carlan, S J. Prostaglandin E2 gel versus misoprostol for cervical ripening in patients with premature rupture of membranes after 34 weeks [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2002,99(2) : 206-210.
  • 9Ozden S, Delikara M N, Arci A, et al. Intravaginal misoprostol vs. expectant management in premature rupture of membranes with low Bishop scores at term [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2002,77(2) : 109-115.
  • 10Zamzami T Y. Prelabor rupture of membranes at term in low-risk women: induce or wait [J]? Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2006, 273 (5) : 278-282.

共引文献85

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部