摘要
对科技期刊编辑在三审过程中修后重审稿件的评判原则、复审、终审、退修、退稿及处理时滞把握等几方面的工作进行分析和讨论,并提出一些更高效、更客观地处理修后重审稿件的方法和建议。
In this paper,several aspects of editorial work for scientific journal editors such as evaluation principles,peer review,final decision, retreat, rejection, and proceeding delay are analyzed and discussed. According to our practical experiences,some suggestions more efficient,objective and feasible for the rereview of revised manuscripts are presented.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第4期354-356,共3页
Acta Editologica
关键词
科技期刊
编辑
修后重审
稿件
处理时滞
sci-tech journal
editor
re-review of revised manuscripts
proceeding delay