期刊文献+

科技期刊编辑对学术不端论文的识别——以《护理学报》为例 被引量:16

Identifying papers with academic misconduct: a case study of Journal of Nursing
原文传递
导出
摘要 以《护理学报》为例,总结科技期刊编辑审稿过程中对学术不端论文的识别。对于"枪手"论文,可从与作者电话沟通中识别,从审稿费汇款信息识别,从网站投稿注册信息识别,以及从作者所在科室与论文研究方向吻合度识别;对于篡改或伪造数据论文,可通过仔细审查文章数据,分析数据与所得统计结果之间是否存在漏洞或矛盾之处,若有质疑则要求作者提供数据输入统计软件的原始表格及统计软件所导出的原始分析结果;对于抄袭中文论文者,可通过多个学术不端文献检测软件结合Baidu、Google等网络平台进行多重检测;对抄袭外文论文者,可通过论文的语言表达、与作者交流等途径识别。 This paper sums up how to identify papers with academic misconduct by editors of scientific journals. Telephone communication, information of remittance for payment to peer reviewers, registration information in website submission and consistency between the content of the paper and the author 's research area all help to distinguish the ghostwriting. Careful data review for whether there are flaws or contradictions between data and statistical results contributes to recognizing papers with forged or falsified data. Multi-detection through the software special for detection of academic misconduct together with websites such as Baidu,Google is beneficial to identifying copied Chinese papers,and for those copied papers in English,expressions in the paper and the communication between authors and editors will play an important role in the distinguishing.
出处 《编辑学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期361-363,共3页 Acta Editologica
关键词 科技期刊 学术不端 防伪举措 sci-tech journal academic misconduct antifake measures
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献64

共引文献161

同被引文献171

引证文献16

二级引证文献177

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部