期刊文献+

道德违规交易行为中的损失规避研究

A Study on Loss-avoidance in Moral Violation Trading Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 损失规避是指在等量情况下,损失比获益产生的心理效用更大,过去多项研究证实其存在普遍性。预期理论通过价值函数对其机制的解释是该研究的主导理论,但也有证据证明损失规避是一种本能行为。本研究以在校大学生为被试,考察道德违规交易行为对损失规避的影响。实验1通过比较道德违规交易行为与规范交易行为买家卖家的出价,证明二者之间的损失规避心理不同,得出道德违规行为会增强损失规避心理的结论。实验2,研究不同角色对考试成绩、金钱、道德的心理感受程度产生的影响,发现卖家比买家更为重视金钱,相反,买家则比卖家更关注考试成绩,但是道德感受在买卖双方间却并无不同。 Loss-avoidance refers to the fact that in equal situations loss produces larger psychological effects than gain. The universality has been proved by many studies in the past. The guiding theory of these studies is the explanation of the mechanism through value function by using expectancy theory. There is also evidence to show that loss-avoidance is an instinctive behavior. In this research college students are were tested to study the influence of moral violation behavior on loss-avoidance. The first experiment compared the price of buyers and sellers between moral violation trading behaviors and regular trading behaviors to illustrate that they have different mentality in loss-avoidance. It concluded that moral violation behaviors will enhance the loss-avoidance mentality. The second experiment studies the influence of scores, money and moral mentality on difference roles. It discovered that the sellers paid more attention to money, whereas the buyers paid more attention to the score of the exam. However, there is no difference between them in there moral feelings.
作者 张锐 钟建军
出处 《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2015年第4期90-96,共7页 Journal of Inner Mongolia Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
关键词 损失规避 预期理论 道德违规 loss-avoidance expectancy theory moral violation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect Theory:An analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica,1979(2).
  • 2Tversky A,Kahneman D.Advances in Prospect Theory:Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty[J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,1992(4).
  • 3Kahneman D.Knetsch J L.Thaler R H.Anomalies:The Endowment Effect,Loss Aversion,and Status Quo Bias[J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1991(1).
  • 4Hoorens V,Remmers N,van de Riet K.Time is an amazingly variable amount of money:Endowment and ownership effects in the subjective value of working time[J].Journal of Economic Psychology,1999(4).
  • 5Carmon Z,Wertenbroch K,Zeelenberg M.Option attachment:When deliberating makes choosing feel like losing[J].Journal of Consumer Research,2003(1).
  • 6Takahashi H,Fujie S,Camerer C,et al.Norepinephrine in the brain is associated with aversion to financial loss[J].Molecular Psychiatry,2013(1).
  • 7Keith Chen M,Lakshminarayanan V,Santos L R.How Basic Are Behavioral Biases Evidence?Evidenceb from Capuchin Monkey Trading Behavior[J].Journal of Political Economy,2006(3).
  • 8侯晓晖,岑国桢.大学生作弊的研究现状与展望:心理学的视角[J].心理科学,2011,34(6):1441-1447. 被引量:15
  • 9Kahneman D,Knetsch J L,Thaler R H.Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the the Coase theorem[J].Journal of Political Economy,1990(6).
  • 10刘腾飞,徐富明,张军伟,蒋多,陈雪玲.禀赋效应的心理机制及其影响因素[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(4):646-654. 被引量:28

二级参考文献157

  • 1段鑫星,池忠军,谷建国.大学生思想道德状况的调查分析[J].中国青年政治学院学报,1998(2):16-21. 被引量:36
  • 2段鑫星.大学生“流行热”透视[J].青年探索,1997(3):32-34. 被引量:1
  • 3沈厚才,徐进,庞湛.损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45. 被引量:44
  • 4史金艳,李凯,郁培丽.考虑损失厌恶的最优消费投资决策[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1196-1199. 被引量:5
  • 5Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138.
  • 6Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 113-123.
  • 7Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
  • 8Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 367-379.
  • 9Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 10Carrnon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.

共引文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部