高管团队信任对创新方式选择问题研究被引量：1

The Impaction of TMT Trust to the Choice of Innovation Strategy:Empirical Study of Jiangsu,Anhui,Beijing

导出

摘要高管团队之间的信任程度直接决定了企业选择那种创新战略。本文从高管团队不同信任关系出发,利用高阶理论,研究高管团队的信任对创新战略选择的影响。通过对江苏、安徽、北京的高新技术企业进行取样,研究发现:关系导向信任越强,越倾向于选择继承式创新战略,工作导向信任越强越倾向于选择颠覆式创新。高管团队异质性正向调节高管团队工作导向信任与颠覆式创新之间的关系。当因变量为继承式创新时负向调节工作导向信任与继承式创新之间的关系并显著,负向调节关系导向信任与颠覆式创新之间关系,正向调节关系导向信任与继承式创新之间的关系。 The trust between TMT（Top management team） determine the choice of innovation strategy, and innovation is the major way to let enterprise sustainable development , so we need to focus on the relationship between TMT internal trust and choice of innovation strategy . we use upper echelon theory , by Jiangsu, Anhui, Beijing＇ s high-tech enterprises sampled. Our founds are ： relation-oriented trust facilitates a firm＇ s strategic choice of explorative innovation, task-oriented trust facilitates a firm＇ s strategic choice of exploitive innovation. TMT heterogeneity positively moderate the relationship between work-oriented trust and exploitive innovation. When the dependent variable is exploitive innovation, negatively moderate relationships between work-oriented trust and exploitive innovation significantly. Negative guide to regulate the relationship between relation-oriented trust and explorative innovation. Moderate the relationship between exploitive innovation and relation -oriented trust positively.

作者施建军王丽邓宏

机构地区对外经济贸易大学管理学院

出处《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第8期39-45,共7页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基金国家社科基金重大项目"‘十二五’时期我国发展的创新驱动战略研究"(11&ZD004) "我国自主创新型技术赶超发展战略与路径研究--基于跨学科协同的多层次整合研究"(12&ZD205)的阶段性成果

关键词继承式创新颠覆式创新高官团队异质性高阶理论 exploitive innovation explorative innovation TMT diversity Theory of upper echelon

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献20

1Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review ,9 (2) , 193 - 206.
2Talke, Katrin, Stiren Salomo, and Katja Rost. "How top man- agement team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. "Research Poli- cy,39.7 (2010) : 907 -918.
3Hambrick, D. C. , 2007. Upper echelons theory: an update. A- cademy of Management Review, 32 (2) , 334 -343.
4Smith, K.G., Smith, K.A., 01Jan, J. D., Sims, H.P., O' Bannon, D.P. , Scully, J. A. , 1994.
5Top management team de- mography and process: the role of social integration and commu- nication. Administrative Science Quarterly 39,412 -438.
6Joshi, A. , Roh, H. , 2009. The role of context in work team di- versity research: ametaanalytic review. Academy of Management Journal 52 (3).
7Yu D, Hang C C(2010). A reflective review of disruptive inno- vation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (4) : 435 -452.
8Certo, S. T. , Lester, R. H. , Dalton, C. M. , Dalton, D. R. , 2006. Top management teams, strategy and financial perform- anee: a meta - analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4) , 813 -839.
9Joshi, A. , Roh, H. , 2009. The role of context in work team di- versity research: ametaanalytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (3).
10Hambriek, D. C. , Finkelstein, S. , Mooney, A. C. , 2005b. Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic de- cisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30 (3), 472-491.