期刊文献+

美国舰船概念方案设计方法发展综述 被引量:7

Review on the development of naval ship conceptual design methods of USA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 舰船的主要总体特性和功能特征是在概念方案设计阶段确定,该阶段对舰船方案的综合效能、研制风险和研制费用具有重要影响。通过分析美国舰船概念方案设计体系和方法发展特点,将其分为舰船综合模型开发、总体方案综合效能评估和总体方案综合优化3个阶段。针对舰船综合模型,归纳整理基本原理和发展历程,分析其不足;阐述基于效能、费用和风险的舰船总体方案综合效能评价体系及方法;对基于综合效能优化的舰船概念方案设计原理及应用进行系统的梳理。美国舰船概念方案设计方法的发展特点与经验对我国舰船概念方案设计体系的研究和发展具有借鉴意义。 The conceptual design of naval ships is of vital significance to the overall effectiveness, development risk, and cost of ships, since the main characteristics and functions of the ship are all determined during this phase. By analyzing the conceptual design progress of US naval ships, three stages can be observed : the development of the ship synthesis model, the research on overall effectiveness, and the general optimization of the conceptual plan. Firstly, the basic principles and drawbacks of the ship synthesis model are analyzed. Secondly, the systematical framework and methods for evaluating the total effectiveness, which are represented by overall effectiveness, development risk, and cost, are presented. Lastly, the optimization of the scheme and its applications are proposed. In brief, certain lessons can be drawn from the progress of US naval ship conceptual exploration methods, which could in turn help us to perfect our own conceptual design systems.
出处 《中国舰船研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期7-15,共9页 Chinese Journal of Ship Research
关键词 舰船设计 概念设计 舰船综合模型 综合效能评估 优化设计 ship design conceptual design ship synthesis model overall measure of effectiveness optimal design
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1WHITCOMB C A, SZATKOWSKI J J. Concept level naval surface combatant design in the axiomatic ap- proach to design framework [ C ]//Proceedings of ICAD, Cambridge, MA. Institute for Axiomatic Design, 2000 : 300-308.
  • 2WHITCOMB C A. Naval ship design philosophy imple- mentation [J]. Naval Engineers Journal, 1998, 110 ( 1 ) : 49-63.
  • 3COTTON J L. Fourth update of CODESHIP payload shopping list, CNA 662-75 [R]. Center for Naval Analyses, 1975.
  • 4TONY E J. Consolidated weight listing for various U. S. Navy cruiser/destroyers [R]. Naval Ship Engineering Center, 1975.
  • 5REED M R. Ship synthesis model for naval surface ships [ D ]. Cambridge, MA : Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1976.
  • 6Naval Surface Warfare Center. ASSET user manual, version 5.0[ M ]. Naval Surface Warfare Center, 1990.
  • 7NETI S N. Ship design optimization using ASSET[D]. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2005.
  • 8SHAHAK S. Naval ship concept design: an evolution- ary approach [ D]. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts In- stitute of Technology, 1998.
  • 9BROWN A, THOMAS L M. Reengineering the naval ship concept design process [ C ]//From Research to Re- ality in Ship Systems Engineering Symposium. Ameri- can Society of Naval Engineers, 1998.
  • 10STEPANCHICK J, BROWN A. Revisiting DDGX/ DDG - 51 concept exploration [J]. Naval Engineers Journal, 2007, 119(3): 67-88.

同被引文献60

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部