期刊文献+

美国学术不端行为监管体系的建设及其对中国的启示 被引量:5

原文传递
导出
摘要 学者可以定义为一个具有特定专业技能、学识水平、创新思维,并能在相关领域提出引领社会潮流之思想的特殊群体,包括了科学家、社会学家、思想家、哲学家、史学家等等。学者肩负着揭示自然和人类社会发展规律、提供求真辨伪理性科学精神的重大责任,这些特性也决定了学者大多是诚实可信的。
出处 《科技导报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第15期12-13,共2页 Science & Technology Review
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Pascal, Chris B. The history and future of the office of research integrity Scientific misconduct and beyond[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1999, 5: 183-198.
  • 2Division of Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services. Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science[Z]. 42 C. F. R. Part 50, 1989.
  • 3National Science Foundation. Misconduct in science and engineering: final rule[J]. Federal Register, 1991, 56: 22286- 22290.
  • 4Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Responsible science: ensuring the integrity of the research process[M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
  • 5Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and misconduct in research[R]. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995.
  • 6Fransis, Sybil. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1999, 5: 261- 272.
  • 7The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Federal policy on research misconduct[J]. Federal Register, 2000, 65 (235).

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部