期刊文献+

破骨细胞对不同底物的吸收活性比较

Effect of osteoclasts on the absorption activity of different substrates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较破骨细胞对牛皮质骨片及牙本质片的吸收活性。方法:采用25 ng/ml巨噬细胞集落刺激因子+30 ng/ml核因子κB受体活化因子配体诱导RAW264.7细胞分化获取破骨细胞,并分别与牛皮质骨片及牙本质片共培养。通过检测抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶(TRAP)染色阳性细胞数、骨吸收陷窝面积,比较破骨细胞在不同底物上的骨吸收活性。结果:与不同底物共培养形成的TRAP阳性细胞数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而牛皮质骨片吸收陷窝的面积显著大于牙本质片(P<0.01)。结论:破骨细胞对牛皮质骨片的吸收活性强于牙本质片。 Objective:To compare the effects of osteoclasts on the absorption activities of the bovine cortical bone slices and dentine discs. Methods:Osteoclasts were harvested from RAW264. 7 cells induced by 25 ng/ml M-CSF combined with 30 ng/ml RANKL, which was cocultured with bovine cortical bone slices and dentine discs,respectively. The number of positive cells and area of resorption lacunae were detected by antitartaric acid phosphatase staining, and the absorption activities of different substrates were compared. Results:The difference of the TRAP positive cells in different substrates coculture was not statistically significant(P&gt;0. 05). The area of resorption lacunae in bovine cortical bone slices was significantly more than that in dentine discs(P〈0. 01). Conclusions:Compared with the dentine discs,the absorption activity of osteoclasts on bovine cortical bone slices is strong.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2015年第7期844-846,共3页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31172373) 安徽省自然科学基金项目(1508085QH172) 安徽省教育厅自然科学研究项目(kj2012z256)
关键词 破骨细胞 吸收活性 牛皮质骨片 牙本质片 osteoclast bone resorption activity bovine cortical bone slice dentin slices
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Huang S ’ Eleniste PP,Wayakanon K,et al. The Rho-GEF Kalirinregulates bone mass and the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts[J]. Bone,2014,60(3) :235 -245.
  • 2Nakamura I,Takahashi N, Jimi E,et al. Regulation of osteoclastfunction [J]. Mod Rheumatol,2012,22(2) :167 - 177.
  • 3Jansen ID, Vermeer JA, Bloemen V, et al. Osteoclast fusion andfission[ J]. Calcif Tissue Int,2012,90(6) :515 -522.
  • 4Narducci P,Nicolin V. Differentiation of activated monocytes intoosteoclast-like cells on a hydroxyapatite substrate: an in vitro study[J]. Ann Anat,2009,191(4) : 349 -355.
  • 5Nakayama T, Mizoguchi T, Uehara S,et al. Polarized osteoclastsput marks of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase on dentin slices—asimple method for identifying polarized osteoclasts [ J ]. Bone,2011,49(6) :1331 -1339.
  • 6Zheng M, Ge Y, Li H,et al. Bergapten prevents lipopolysaccharide mediated osteoclast formation, bone resorption and osteoclast survival [ J]. Int Orthop ,2014,38 ( 3 ) :627 - 634.
  • 7Kusumbe A P, Adams RH. Osteoclast progenitors promote bonevascularization and osteogenesis [ J] . Nat Med,2014,20 ( 11) :1238 -1240.
  • 8Hirose J, Masuda H, Tokuyama N, et al. Bone resorption isregulated by cell-autonomous negative feedback loop of Stat5-Dusp axis in the osteoclast [ J ]. J Exp Med,2014, 211 ( 1 ):153 -163.
  • 9Davison NL, ten Harkel B, et al. Osteoclast resorption of ji-tiicalcium phosphate controlled by surface architecture [ J ].Biomaterials,2014,35(26) :7441 -7451.
  • 10云帆,王瑞,赵建宁.破骨细胞的骨吸收机制[J].中国骨伤,2014,27(6):529-532. 被引量:25

二级参考文献35

  • 1Lacey D,Timms E,Tan H,et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cy- tokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation [J]. Cell, 1998,93 (2) : 165-176.
  • 2Simonet W, Lacey D, Dunstan C, et al. Osteoprotegerin : a novel se- creted protein involved in the regulation of bone density[J]. Cell, 1997,89(2) :309-319.
  • 3Hofbauer LC ,Schopper M. Clinical implications of the osteoprote- gering/RANKL/RANK system for bone and vascular diseases [J]. JAMA, 2004,292 (4) :490-495.
  • 4Chambers TJ,Thomson BM, Fuller K. Effect of substrate composi- tion on bone resorption by rabbit osteoclasts[J]. J Cell Sci, 1984, 70:61-71.
  • 5Jurdic P,Saltel F, Chabadel A,et al. Podosome and sealing zone: specificity of the osteoclast model [ J ]. Eur J Cell Biol, 2006,85 ( 3- 4) : 195-202.
  • 6Destaing O, Saltel F, Geminard JC, et al. Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actin-green fluorescent protein[J]. Mol Biol Cell,2003,14(2): 407-416.
  • 7Saltel F, Destaing O, Bard F, et al. Apatitemediated actin dynamics in resorbing osteoclasts [ J ]. Mol Biol Cel, 2004,15 ( 12 ) : 5231-5241.
  • 8Luxenburg C, Geblinger D, Klein E, et al. The architecture of the adhesive apparatus of cultured osteoclasts :from podosome forma- tion to sealing zone assembly [ J ]. PLoS One, 2007,2 (1) :e179.
  • 9Engelman VW, Nickols GA, Ross FP, et al. A peptidomimetic an- tagonist of the alpha (v)beta (3) integrin inhibits bone resorption in vitro and prevents osteoporosls in vivo[J]. J Clin Irtvest, 1997, 99 (9) : 2284-2292.
  • 10Schmidt S,Nakchbandi l,Ruppert R,et al. Kindlin-3-mediated signaling from muhiplc integrin classes is required for osteoclast- mediated bone resorption [ J ]. J Cell Biol, 2011,192 (5) : 883-897.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部