家属对同伴实施纳洛酮急救海洛因过量认可情况分析

A FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS ABOUT COMPANIONS FROM THE FAMILY VIEW OF NALOXONE FIRST-AID HEROIN OVERDOSE

目的:对接受过同伴纳洛酮急救服务者的家属进行调查,以了解和评估同伴纳洛酮急救服务的可行性。獉獉方法:2013年8-9月在云南3个州市7个县,以曾经接受过纳洛酮急救服务的注射吸毒过量人员家属为调查对獉獉象,知情同意后,问卷收集人口学信息、家人既往过量及接受急救情况、服务认可度,并对3个州市情况作对比分析等,Epidata建立数据库,SPSS17.0进行统计学分析。结果:205名家属接受调查,家人发生一次以上过量者110人獉獉(53.7%);共161人曾接受过同伴纳洛酮急救服务(78.5%);分别有189人(92.6%)和160人(78.4%)的家属认为因"救家人一命"、"没有收费"而受益;分别有157人(76.6%)家属认为同伴纳洛酮急救安全;158人(77.1%)支持并赞同同伴实施纳洛酮急救;无人因同伴急救失败而追究。结论:家属多愿意选择同伴为其注射吸毒家人提供獉獉纳洛酮急救服务,家属多认为同伴开展纳洛酮急救服务安全可行。

Objective：To undersand and assess feasibility of naloxone emergency services by peer investigation. Methods：We selected the people whose family had received naloxone aid service from 7 counties in 3 states of Yunnan Province during Aug - Set in 2013. The questionnaire included demographic information, previous overdose information, received service situation, acceptance of service. The data were compared among the 3 states. The data was entered in Epidata and statistically analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software. Results：There were 205 families received survey, among them 110 （53.7%） used drug overdose; 161 （78.5%） had received naloxone emergency services by peer; 92. 6% and 78.4% families were benefit from ＂success for emergency service＂ and ＂free of this service＂ respectively; 77. 1% families supported the implementation of the emergency, and no family tracked accountability because of peer failure to rescue. Conclusion： Families willing to choose naloxone emergency services by peer. It is feasible and safe.