期刊文献+

腹腔镜修补术治疗胃穿孔的临床效果 被引量:6

The Clinical Effects of Laparoscopic Repair in the Treatment of Gastric Perforation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜修补术治疗胃穿孔的临床效果。方法选取于2013年1月~2014年2月来院治疗的胃穿孔患者90例作为研究对象,随机数字表达法分为对照组和观察组,各组45例,对照组采用开腹手术治疗,观察组采取腹腔镜修补术治疗,比较两组患者治疗后的临床效果。结果观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、住院时间优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率(4.44%)低于对照组的(13.33%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.8812,P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜修补术治疗胃穿孔的临床疗效优于传统开腹手术治疗,具有创伤小、术后恢复快、并发症少等优点。 ObjectiveTo study the efect of laparoscopic repair in the treatment of gastric perforation.Methods Selected 90 cases of patients with gastric perforation as the research object from January 2013 to February 2014,the random number expression,was divided into control group and observation group,each group 45 cases,control group treated with open operation,observation group treated with laparoscopic repair,to compare the clinical efect of two groups of patients after treatment.ResultsThe observation group of operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative exhaust time,length of hospital stay were better than that of control group,diference had statistical significance(P〈 0.05),observation group the incidence of postoperative complications(4.44%)was lower than the control group(13.33%),the diference was statisticaly significant(χ2=4.8812,P〈 0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic repair the clinical curative efect of treatment of gastric perforation was superior to that of the traditional open surgery,has smal trauma,quick recovery,less complications.
作者 张伟峰
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2015年第20期54-55,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 胃穿孔 腹腔镜修补术 临床效果 Gastric perforation Laparoscopic repair Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献14

共引文献59

同被引文献55

  • 1黄素.腹腔镜胃穿孔修补术与开腹手术后患者康复情况的临床比较研究[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(22):82-83. 被引量:5
  • 2王忠军.腹腔镜修补术与开腹修补术治疗胃穿孔疗效对比研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2013(12):140-141.
  • 3Bertleff MJ,Lange JF. Perforated peptic ulcer disease:a review of history and treatment [ J ]. Dig Surg,2010,27 ( 3 ) : 161 - 169.
  • 4Agresta F, Mazzarolo G, Ciardo LF, et al. The laparoscopic ap- proach in abdominal emergencies: has the attitude changed?:A single-center review of a 15-year experience [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22(5) :1255 - 1262.
  • 5Bertleff M J, Lange JF. Laparoscopie correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice.'? A review of literature[ J]. Surg Endosc,2010, 24(6) :1231 - 1239.
  • 6Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer[ J ]. Br J Surg, 1990,77 ( 9 ) : 1006.
  • 7Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Mason RJ,et al. Aparoscopic repair of per- forated duodenal ulcers : outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive pa- tients[J]. Arch Surg,1999,134(8) :845 -848.
  • 8Lunevicius R, Morkevieius M. Comparison of laparoseopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers [ J ]. Surg Endosc,2005, 19(12) :1565 - 1571.
  • 9Bingener J, Loomis EA, Gostout CJ,et al. Feasibility of NOTES o- mental plug repair of perforated peptic ulcers: results from a clini- cal pilot trial[ J]. Surg Endosc ,2013,27(6) :2201 - 2208.
  • 10Lam PW, Lain MC, Hui EK, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers :the " three-stitch" Graham patch technique [ J 1. Surg Endosc,2005,19 (12) : 1627 - 1630.

引证文献6

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部