期刊文献+

论胡绍煐《文选笺证》及其与徽州朴学的关系

The Relationship between Notes about Literary Anthology by Hu Shaoying and Philology of Huizhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文选学在清代达到第二次高峰,徽州胡绍煐《文选笺证》是较早运用以声求义和连语理论研究《文选》的著作,在文选学史上具有不可替代的重要位置。《文选笺证》的研究方法受到徽州朴学治经方法的明显影响,与胡氏家学和师学渊源均不无关系。 Studies of literary anthology reached its second peak in the Qing Dynasty. Notes about Literary Anthology written by Hu Shaoying of Huizhou is an early work that studies Literary Anthology through seeking meaning from sounds and Lianmian words theory, thus occupying an irreplaceable position in the history of studies of literary anthology. The research method of Notes about Literary Anthology is evidently affected by philology of Huizhou, and is closely related to Hu's family and his teacher's education.
作者 张振国
机构地区 黄山学院文学院
出处 《黄山学院学报》 2015年第4期10-13,共4页 Journal of Huangshan University
基金 黄山学院徽州文化重点研究项目(2013xhwh001) (2015xhwh002)
关键词 绩溪 胡绍煐 徽州朴学 《昭明文选笺证》 文选学 Jixi county Hu Shaoying philology of Huizhou Notes about Zhaoming Literary Anthology studies of literary anthology
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1清·张之洞.书目答问补正[M].范希曾补正.上海:上海古籍出版社,2001:82,147,168.
  • 2清·汪士铎.胡君枕泉传[C]//闵尔昌.碑传集补:卷三二.燕京大学国学研究所铅印本,1923.
  • 3清·江藩.汉学师承记笺释:下册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社.2006.
  • 4清·胡绍烘.昭明文选笺证[M].扬州:广陵古籍刻印社,1990.
  • 5将立甫.《文选笺证》校误[J].古籍整理研究学刊,1996(3):26-35. 被引量:1
  • 6张冬云.《文选笺证》训诂之得失[J].濮阳教育学院学报,2003,16(3):4-6. 被引量:1
  • 7清·戴震.戴震集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 8(清)段玉裁.说文解字注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1981.
  • 9清·王引之.经义述闻[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,1985.524.
  • 10清·王念孙.读书杂志[M].上海:商务印书馆,1933.

二级参考文献1

  • 1(汉)许慎 撰,(清)段玉裁.说文解字注[M]上海古籍出版社,1981.

共引文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部