期刊文献+

论出版商对《项狄传》文类属性的影响

A Study of the Publisher's Influence on the Generic Nature of “Tristram Shandy”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从20世纪50年代以来所形成的斯特恩研究传统来看,《项狄传》是讽刺文还是小说的文类定性始终是评论界的研究焦点,但鲜有人论及出版商在《项狄传》文类属性形成中的作用。文章分析斯特恩与出版商的协商过程,指出斯特恩在出版商的引导下有意识地去除《项狄传》的讽刺文属性,融入小说属性。 Considering the studies of Laurence Sterne since 1950s, a hot topic is whether "Tristram Shandy" is a satire or novel. However, the publisher' s role that influences its genre category is rarely concerned. By analyzing the negotiation process between Sterne and publisher, it is pointed out that Sterne got rid of the satire features under the guidance of the publisher and meanwhile employed more novel elements.
作者 魏艳辉
机构地区 哈尔滨理工大学
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2015年第8期91-94,共4页 Journal of Harbin University
关键词 《项狄传》 出版商 文类 "Tristram Shandy" publisher genre
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1魏艳辉.《项狄传》形式研究趋向及展望[J].国外文学,2013(2):42-50. 被引量:5
  • 2Terry Belanger. Publishers and writers in eighteenth- century England[ A]. in Isabel Rivers, ed. Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-century England [ C ]. New York : Leie'ester University Press, 1982.
  • 3罗贝尔·埃斯卡皮.于沛选.文学社会学-罗·埃斯卡皮文论选[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1987.
  • 4Tierney, James E. The Correspondence of Robert Dods- Icy 1733 - 1764 [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge Universi- ty Press, 1988.
  • 5New, Melvyn and Peter de Voogd. Laurence Sterne, The Letters [ M ]. Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 2009.
  • 6Ross, Ian Campbell. Laurence Sterne : A Life [ M ]. Ox- ford : Oxford University Press ,2001.
  • 7Keymer, Thomas. Sterne, the Moderns and the Novel [ M ]. Oxford : Oxford University Press ,2002.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Lodwick Hartley, Sterne in the Twentieth Century: An Essay and a Bibliography of Sternean Studies 1900 -1965 (Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 196) , 131 - 154.
  • 2Alan B. How ed., Laurence Sterne: The Critical Heritage ( London and New York: Routledge, 1971 ) , pp. 47-48, p. 77, p. 390.
  • 3劳伦斯·斯特恩:《项狄传》,蒲隆译,译林出版社2006年版,71-82,110页.
  • 4Theodore Baird, "The Time-Scheme of Tristram Shandy and a Source", PMLA 51 (1936) , pp. 803 -820.
  • 5Wayne Booth, "Did Sterne Complete Tristram Shandy?" , Modern Philology 48 (1951), pp. 172 - 183.
  • 6William Bowman Piper, "Tristram ' s Disgressive Artistry " , Lattrence Sterne ' s Tristram Shandy, ed. Howard Anderson (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1980), pp. 259 -270.
  • 7Wolfgang Iser, Laurence Sterne: Tristram Shandy, trans.David Henry Wilson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 128.
  • 8Victor Shklovsky, " Sterne' s Tristram Shandy: Stylistic Commentary", Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, trans. Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis ( Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1965), p. 57.
  • 9F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition (London: Chatto & Windus, 1962), p. 2.
  • 10Alan D. McKillop, "A View of Sterne's Art, rev. of Tristram Shandy' s World: Sterne' s Philosophical Rhetoric, by 1ohn Traugott" , The Sewanee Review 63 ( 1955 ) , p. 687.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部