摘要
知识产权诉讼中的技术问题具有多样性、新颖性、争议性、假设性等特点,我国《民事诉讼法》规定的鉴定制度和专家辅助人制度不能满足知识产权诉讼技术问题事实查明的需要,各国也在积极改革各自的技术查明机制。我国应建立以专家辅助人为主、鉴定制度、专家裁判官、公知资讯听证制度为辅的多元化技术查明机制,将专家顾问制度并入专家辅助人制度。
The technical issues of intellectual property litigation have diversity, novelty, controversial assumptions and other characteristics. The identification system and expert assistant system of China's Civil Procedure Law cannot meet the needs that the intellectual property litigation system technical problems should be identified. States are also actively reforming their identification mechanism of technical issues. China should establish a diversified identification mechanism of technical issues with expert assistant system predominantly, supplemented by identify mechanisms, expert magistrate system, known information hearing system, and expert consultants system which incorporated expert assistant system.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第8期36-40,共5页
Intellectual Property
基金
河北省社会科学基金项目<民事司法权力运行机制的改革与实践例>(HB13FX004)
教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助(NECT-13-0790)
关键词
知识产权诉讼
技术查明机制
多元化
intellectual property litigation
identify mechanism'of technical problems
diversification